Hi Jason, I looked at the part of FRAME.cbf you posted, and I'd say it looks ok (i.e. nothing to worry about).
Some overlap of a reflection doesn't matter much; if its full profile is not available then INTEGRATE replaces the missing intensity by an estimate based on the known fraction of the intensity. Below a cutoff of MINPK (default is 75 %) however the estimate is considered inaccurate and the reflection is discarded. To judge whether and how many reflections are affected by overlaps, you should consult the table in XDSSTAT.LP; it has no graphical representation and it is a little dense (sorry). If many reflections fail the MINPK test, you might get better completeness if you re-integrate with lower values of the mosaicity - see http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de/xdswiki/index.php/Optimisation . If the data are for molecular replacement and refinement, you might want to decrease MINPK somewhat (check the table in XDSSTAT.LP!). As this is at the cost of data quality, I'd not recommend this for experimental phasing. HTH, Kay
