It is a wonderful server indeed, but its default setting cuts the resolution at 3 sigma (if I remember correctly). It is too stringent in my opinion. Also, it is not clear to me whether to submit all data to the highest resolution point, or the data that come from the server? But then again, the question remains at what sigma level to cut them?
Aex On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:46 AM, David Schuller wrote: > On 04/09/12 12:32, Boaz Shaanan wrote: >> How about such a footnote to Table 1: >> >> "The resolution of data is 3A in the a direction, 3.5A in b direction and >> 5A in the c direction" >> >> Wouldn't this do the trick? >> > Usually there's a requirement for a table of statistics, including > completeness and R in the outer shell. In the case of anisotropic data, > what constitutes the outer shell? > > This is not a rhetorical question, I have some anisotropic data myself > and will be facing these questions when it comes time to publish. > > This looks like a good place to plug the UCLA MBI Diffraction Anisotropy > Server, which I found to be useful: > http://services.mbi.ucla.edu/anisoscale/ > > Cheers, > > -- > ======================================================================= > All Things Serve the Beam > ======================================================================= > David J. Schuller > modern man in a post-modern world > MacCHESS, Cornell University > schul...@cornell.edu
