Hi Bernhard

So what's new?  See
http://ccp4bb.blogspot.com/2011/11/pdb-header-info-wrong.html
(17-Nov-11).

Cheers

-- Ian


On 2 January 2012 06:58, Bernhard Rupp (Hofkristallrat a.D.)
<hofkristall...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> it seems to me that at least Refmac 5.6.0117 does not report the actual
> lowest resolution used in refinement, but instead the lowest resolution of
> the hkl index range generated by the default cif import script instead.
>
> REMARK   3  DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
> REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH (ANGSTROMS) :   1.99
> REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE LOW  (ANGSTROMS) :  38.63 <---
>
>  The data go only to 28.66 A according to mtzdump as well as xprep
>
>  as far as I can tell, cif2mtz does it right and reports
>
> * Cell Dimensions : (obsolete - refer to dataset cell dimensions above)
>
>   33.1300   57.2300   38.6500   90.0000   91.9400   90.0000
>
>  *  Resolution Range :
>
>    0.00122    0.25305     (     28.660 -      1.988 A ) < -----
>
> then the script calls unique  which pads the reflections up
>
>  * Cell Dimensions : (obsolete - refer to dataset cell dimensions above)
>
>   33.1300   57.2300   38.6500   90.0000   91.9400   90.0000
>
>  *  Resolution Range :
>
>    0.00067    0.25302     (     38.628 -      1.988 A ) <-----
>
> which then propagates to CAD and FREEFLAG into the MTZ header where it is
> picked up by refmac.
>
> OVERALL FILE STATISTICS for resolution range   0.001 -   0.253
>  =======================
>  Col Sort    Min    Max    Num      %     Mean     Mean   Resolution   Type
> Column
>  num order               Missing complete          abs.   Low    High
> label
>
>   1 ASC    -16      16      0  100.00      0.1      6.3  38.63   1.99   H
> H
>   2 NONE     0      28      0  100.00     10.5     10.5  38.63   1.99   H
> K
>   3 NONE     0      19      0  100.00      7.3      7.3  38.63   1.99   H
> L
>   4 NONE    0.0     9.0     0  100.00     4.50     4.50 38.63 1.99   I
> FREE
>   5 NONE    7.7   707.8   361   96.40   102.76   102.76  28.66   1.99   F
> FP <----- this is the right number!
>   6 NONE    1.6    37.3   361   96.40     8.84     8.84  28.66   1.99   Q
> SIGFP
>
>
> I have noticed that other PDB/sf file sets (not mine) seem to be affected as
> well.....
>
> Best regards, BR
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Bernhard Rupp
> 001 (925) 209-7429
> +43 (676) 571-0536
> b...@ruppweb.org
> hofkristall...@gmail.com
> http://www.ruppweb.org/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> No animals were hurt or killed during the
> production of this email.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to