That's a good question ! Here is my take on it:

We are talking of say 5% PEG 2K weight per weight. So 5% PEG 2K and 5% PEG 20K 
contains ~ the same weight of polymer per liter of solution, and therefore the 
~ same molarity of the ethylene oxide motif. Hence neglecting the effect of the 
ends of the polymer one would expect 5% PEG 2K and 5% PEG 20K to be nearly 
equivalent.

In practice there are some variations in the required PEG concentration, but it 
certainly does not vary say 5-fold between PEG 1K and PEG 5K.

Also the following is often true: small PEGs < 800 trend all the behave the 
same, but as a different class of precipitant than medium-sized PEG, which 
themselves are different than the very large PEG (10K and above). So if a 
protein crystallizes with PEG 4K as precipitant it *usually* does not 
crystallize with PEG 400, and the same can be said for PEG 20K vs. PEG 2K. The 
small PEGs are much better cryoprotectants.

Thierry

________________________________
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Israel 
Sanchez
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 2:40 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] The stupid/naive question

Hello folks,

After a discussion with a colleague a question aroused regarding precipitants 
in crystallisation conditions. I must confess that I do not know if it is a 
really naive question or just a stupid one (guess the second option 
thought...), anyhow there we go:

Imagine you have crystallisation condition that is more or less successful but 
not so great, that is, you are looking for some optimisation. Your condition 
let say is 5% PEG 20K. Assuming a world where  relationships are linear (and I 
know this is not true, by the way...), I would say that I can change 5%-PEG20K 
by 50%-PEG2K.
So the question is, does anyone know if someone has invest some time in 
discovering this kind of relationships between main precipitants used in 
macromolecular crystallography?

The reason for this kind of weird question is that currently one of our 
cryo-protection protocol really damage our crystals and I was wondering if the 
same crystal could grow in a cryo-condition or something closer to it.

Thank you for investing some time in such a awkward question!!!



--
 Israel Sanchez Fernandez PhD
Ramakrishnan-lab
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK


Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck & Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station,
New Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates Direct contact information
for affiliates is available at 
http://www.merck.com/contact/contacts.html) that may be confidential,
proprietary copyrighted and/or legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity named on this message. If you are
not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete it from 
your system.

Reply via email to