Hi
We "improved" the code between the two versions - i.e. we made
changes that should make processing more reliable. In particular, we
changed the way the different parts of partial reflections are
apportioned in the postrefinement, which was intended to make the
refinement of the mosaicity more stable.
On 29 Sep 2011, at 18:43, ka...@ssl.serc.iisc.ernet.in wrote:
Dear users,
I was trying to process a C2221 data in two different versions
of imosflm (7.0.4 and 7.0.7) using same set of frames, later on
scaled using scala in ccp4 6.1.2. But for m surprise the statistics
were quite different in two cases:
In case of 7.0.4:
Overall InnerShell
OuterShell
Low resolution limit 42.37 42.37 2.11
High resolution limit 2.00 6.32 2.00
Rmerge 0.079 0.027 0.521
Average mosaicity: 1.53
In case of 7.0.7:
Overall InnerShell
OuterShell
Low resolution limit 42.35 42.35 2.11
High resolution limit 2.00 6.32 2.00
Rmerge 0.069 0.020 0.500
Average mosaicity: 2.54
Can anyone explain the reason for such and ambiguity?
Thanking you
With Regards
M. Kavyashree
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Harry
--
Dr Harry Powell,
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
Hills Road,
Cambridge,
CB2 0QH
