On the surface it doesn't seem as bad as others, i.e., it does not seem to be a real fake--perhaps just a strong form of wishful thinking and creative density interpretation. I wonder what would be a good metric in which to establish a cutoff for present/not present in density. CC, maybe?
Jacob On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:01 PM, David Schuller <dj...@cornell.edu> wrote: > Time to fuel up the gossip engines for the approaching weekend: > > > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096921260800186X > > RETRACTED: Structure of the Parathyroid Hormone Receptor C Terminus Bound to > the G-Protein Dimer Gβ1γ2 > Structure, Volume 16, Issue 7, 9 July 2008, Pages 1086-1094 > Structure 2QNS withdrawn. > > -- > ======================================================================= > All Things Serve the Beam > ======================================================================= > David J. Schuller > modern man in a post-modern world > MacCHESS, Cornell University > schul...@cornell.edu > -- ******************************************* Jacob Pearson Keller Northwestern University Medical Scientist Training Program cel: 773.608.9185 email: j-kell...@northwestern.edu *******************************************
