Dirk
Another way of looking at it 
See slide 7 in
http://www.aps.anl.gov/Science/Future/Workshops/Frontier_Science_Using_Soft_Xrays/Presentations/WeierstalTalk.pdf

 sampling interval 1/W (Bragg sampling) is Shannon sampling if complex 
Fraunhofer wavefield of object with width W is recorded.

If only Fraunhofer intensity of object with width W is recorded, then the FT of 
the intensity is the autocorrelation with width 2W and the correct (Shannon) 
sampling interval is 1/2W.

Additional issues are present for 2D and 3D but the above gives the basic idea.

> the sampling of the continuous molecular transform imposed by the crystal 
> lattice is sufficient to get the desired information at a given resolution?
Yes, if you have phased amplitudes
Regards
  Colin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of
> Dirk Kostrewa
> Sent: 15 April 2011 12:20
> To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> Subject: [ccp4bb] Lattice sampling and resolution - a seeming paradox?
> 
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> I just stumbled across a simple question and a seeming paradox for me
> in
> crystallography, that puzzles me. Maybe, it is also interesting for
> you.
> 
> The simple question is: is the discrete sampling of the continuous
> molecular Fourier transform imposed by the crystal lattice sufficient
> to
> get the desired information at a given resolution?
> 
>  From my old lectures in Biophysics at the University, I know it has
> been theoretically proven, but I don't recall the argument, anymore. I
> looked into a couple of crystallography books and I couldn't find the
> answer in any of those. Maybe, you can help me out.
> 
> Let's do a simple gedankenexperiment/thought experiment in the
> 1-dimensional crystal case with unit cell length a, and desired
> information at resolution d.
> 
> According to Braggs law, the resolution for a first order reflection
> (n=1) is:
> 
> 1/d = 2*sin(theta)/lambda
> 
> with 2*sin(theta)/lambda being the length of the scattering vector |S|,
> which gives:
> 
> 1/d = |S|
> 
> In the 1-dimensional crystal, we sample the continuous molecular
> transform at discrete reciprocal lattice points according to the von
> Laue condition, S*a = h, which gives |S| = h/a here. In other words,
> the
> unit cell with length a is subdivided into h evenly spaced
> crystallographic planes with distance d = a/h.
> 
> Now, the discrete sampling by the crystallographic planes a/h is only
> 1x
> the resolution d. According to the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem in
> Fourier transformation, in order to get a desired information at a
> given
> frequency, we would need a discrete sampling frequency of *twice* that
> frequency (the Nyquist frequency).
> 
> In crystallography, this Nyquist frequency is also used, for instance,
> in the calculation of electron density maps on a discrete grid, where
> the grid spacing for an electron density map at resolution d should be
> <= d/2. For calculating that electron density map by Fourier
> transformation, all coefficients from -h to +h would be used, which
> gives twice the number of Fourier coefficients, but the underlying
> sampling of the unit cell along a with maximum index |h| is still only
> a/h!
> 
> This leads to my seeming paradox: according to Braggs law and the von
> Laue conditions, I get the information at resolution d already with a
> 1x
> sampling a/h, but according to the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theory, I
> would need a 2x sampling a/(2h).
> 
> So what is the argument again, that the sampling of the continuous
> molecular transform imposed by the crystal lattice is sufficient to get
> the desired information at a given resolution?
> 
> I would be very grateful for your help!
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dirk.
> 
> --
> 
> *******************************************************
> Dirk Kostrewa
> Gene Center Munich, A5.07
> Department of Biochemistry
> Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
> Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25
> D-81377 Munich
> Germany
> Phone:        +49-89-2180-76845
> Fax:  +49-89-2180-76999
> E-mail:       kostr...@genzentrum.lmu.de
> WWW:  www.genzentrum.lmu.de
> *******************************************************

Reply via email to