Dear Anita,

Sometimes the protein of interest has a relatively strong inherent binding 
affinity to the IMAC
column. Have you tried to bind the cleavage reaction to an IMAC column 
and then elute using a shallow imidazole gradient?

In fact, Porath developed IMAC chromatography as a tool for protein 
fractionation long before
molecular biology provided the tools necessary to add poly-histidine tags to 
target proteins 
(Nature. 1975 Dec 18;258(5536):598-9).

Best regards,

Martin

On Apr 8, 2011, at 4:37 AM, anita p wrote:

> Hi Crystallographers,
>  I am working of 23 Kda protein with a Nterminal  His tag and a TEV cleavage 
> site.
>  I am getting crystals with the his tag and tev site intact, but they dont 
> diffract.
>  Is it probable that they dont diffract because of the extra his tag and the 
> tev site?
> 
>  I am trying to get rid of this tag but the reaction is optimum at 10:1 
> protein to TEV ratio in micrograms overnight incubation without shaking.
>  I tried to run it on histrap column after this reaction but I am not able to 
> purify  cleaved protein from TEV and uncleaved.
>  I have tried several times but I get 3 bands ie., the TEV, uncleaved and 
> Cleaved.
>  I have also tried to use the Nibeads instead of the histrap column, but no 
> difference is seen.
>  Is there a possible way to approach this problem?
> 
>  Suggestions awaited
>  Anita

Reply via email to