Ditto. YES, still generally prefer CNS v1.3 to REFMAC, especially due to composite and simulated-annealing maps.
Different set of flagged reflections, so it might very well be different. Also, the low-resolution solvent scaling is different between the two refinements. Bernie Santarsiero On Wed, February 16, 2011 7:53 am, Boaz Shaanan wrote: > Yes X 2 > > Boaz > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: REX PALMER <rex.pal...@btinternet.com> > Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 15:32 > Subject: [ccp4bb] CNS and protein structure refinement > To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > >> Does anyone still use CNS ? >> Do we expect Rfree from CNS for example to be different from the >> value given by Refmac at the end of the refinement? >> Â >> Rex Palmer >> Â >> Birkbeck College > > Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D. > Dept. of Life Sciences > Ben-Gurion University of the Negev > Beer-Sheva 84105 > Israel > Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710 > Skype: boaz.shaananâ >
