On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Franklin <mfrank...@nysbc.org>wrote:
> However, I'm not sure if you're doing the right thing by leaving SIGF > unassigned. I believe this should be assigned to the experimental error, > which is usually called 'SIGF' in your mtz file. I don't know if FFT > actually uses this for anything when it's calculating your map file. I'm > also not sure what you should use for the weight parameter - perhaps 'FOM'? > FWT,PHWT has the weights already applied to the amplitudes*, so no FOM is necessary. According to the FFT documentation, the sigmas can be used to exclude reflections (subject to an additional keyword), but I assume by default it will just be ignored. -Nat (* FWT = "2mFo-DFc", where "m" is the FOM.)
