Dear Collins and all,
 
Thanks for the reply. Please find the following pdb header. For your 
information, this is after refmac5 with twin-refinement option selected. This 
is the best R values that I'm getting. Cutting resolution does not help much in 
getting the Rs down... 
 
 
HEADER    SWISS-MODEL SERVER (                    pa-JAN-g)   XXXX              
COMPND    SS-MODEL                                                              
REMARK   3
REMARK   3 REFINEMENT.
REMARK   3   PROGRAM     : REFMAC 5.5.0109 
REMARK   3   AUTHORS     : MURSHUDOV,VAGIN,DODSON
REMARK   3
REMARK   3    REFINEMENT TARGET : MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH (ANGSTROMS) :   1.52
REMARK   3   RESOLUTION RANGE LOW  (ANGSTROMS) :  74.96
REMARK   3   DATA CUTOFF            (SIGMA(F)) : NONE
REMARK   3   COMPLETENESS FOR RANGE        (%) :  91.56
REMARK   3   NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS             :   27851
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  FIT TO DATA USED IN REFINEMENT.
REMARK   3   CROSS-VALIDATION METHOD          : THROUGHOUT
REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST SET SELECTION  : RANDOM
REMARK   3   R VALUE     (WORKING + TEST SET) : 0.42077
REMARK   3   R VALUE            (WORKING SET) :  0.42170
REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE                     :  0.40609
REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST SET SIZE   (%) :  5.4
REMARK   3   FREE R VALUE TEST SET COUNT      :  1584
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  FIT IN THE HIGHEST RESOLUTION BIN.
REMARK   3   TOTAL NUMBER OF BINS USED           :      20
REMARK   3   BIN RESOLUTION RANGE HIGH           :    1.522
REMARK   3   BIN RESOLUTION RANGE LOW            :    1.561
REMARK   3   REFLECTION IN BIN     (WORKING SET) :     1804
REMARK   3   BIN COMPLETENESS (WORKING+TEST) (%) :    82.44
REMARK   3   BIN R VALUE           (WORKING SET) :    0.529
REMARK   3   BIN FREE R VALUE SET COUNT          :      121
REMARK   3   BIN FREE R VALUE                    :    0.622
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  NUMBER OF NON-HYDROGEN ATOMS USED IN REFINEMENT.
REMARK   3   ALL ATOMS                :      984
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  B VALUES.
REMARK   3   FROM WILSON PLOT           (A**2) : NULL
REMARK   3   MEAN B VALUE      (OVERALL, A**2) :  18.096
REMARK   3   OVERALL ANISOTROPIC B VALUE.
REMARK   3    B11 (A**2) :     8.45
REMARK   3    B22 (A**2) :   -12.86
REMARK   3    B33 (A**2) :     4.41
REMARK   3    B12 (A**2) :     0.51
REMARK   3    B13 (A**2) :    -1.32
REMARK   3    B23 (A**2) :    -8.65
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  ESTIMATED OVERALL COORDINATE ERROR.
REMARK   3   ESU BASED ON R VALUE                            (A):   0.032
REMARK   3   ESU BASED ON FREE R VALUE                       (A):   0.026
REMARK   3   ESU BASED ON MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD                 (A):   0.082
REMARK   3   ESU FOR B VALUES BASED ON MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (A**2):   5.306
REMARK   3
REMARK   3 CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS.
REMARK   3   CORRELATION COEFFICIENT FO-FC      :   0.812
REMARK   3   CORRELATION COEFFICIENT FO-FC FREE :   0.853
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  RMS DEVIATIONS FROM IDEAL VALUES        COUNT    RMS    WEIGHT
REMARK   3   BOND LENGTHS REFINED ATOMS        (A):  1016 ; 0.008 ; 0.022
REMARK   3   BOND ANGLES REFINED ATOMS   (DEGREES):  1382 ; 1.482 ; 1.974
REMARK   3   TORSION ANGLES, PERIOD 1    (DEGREES):   122 ; 9.603 ; 5.000
REMARK   3   TORSION ANGLES, PERIOD 2    (DEGREES):    46 ;33.363 ;26.087
REMARK   3   TORSION ANGLES, PERIOD 3    (DEGREES):   176 ;21.472 ;15.000
REMARK   3   TORSION ANGLES, PERIOD 4    (DEGREES):     2 ;13.956 ;15.000
REMARK   3   CHIRAL-CENTER RESTRAINTS       (A**3):   144 ; 0.102 ; 0.200
REMARK   3   GENERAL PLANES REFINED ATOMS      (A):   774 ; 0.007 ; 0.022
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  ISOTROPIC THERMAL FACTOR RESTRAINTS.     COUNT   RMS    WEIGHT
REMARK   3   MAIN-CHAIN BOND REFINED ATOMS  (A**2):   624 ; 0.917 ; 1.500
REMARK   3   MAIN-CHAIN ANGLE REFINED ATOMS (A**2):  1020 ; 1.686 ; 2.000
REMARK   3   SIDE-CHAIN BOND REFINED ATOMS  (A**2):   392 ; 1.691 ; 3.000
REMARK   3   SIDE-CHAIN ANGLE REFINED ATOMS (A**2):   362 ; 2.734 ; 4.500
REMARK   3
REMARK   3 ANISOTROPIC THERMAL FACTOR RESTRAINTS.    COUNT   RMS   WEIGHT
REMARK   3   RIGID-BOND RESTRAINTS          (A**2):  1016 ; 0.952 ; 3.000
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  NCS RESTRAINTS STATISTICS
REMARK   3   NUMBER OF NCS GROUPS : NULL
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  TWIN DETAILS
REMARK   3   NUMBER OF TWIN DOMAINS  :    4
REMARK   3      TWIN DOMAIN   :    1
REMARK   3      TWIN OPERATOR :  H,  K,  L
REMARK   3      TWIN FRACTION : 0.307
REMARK   3      TWIN DOMAIN   :    2
REMARK   3      TWIN OPERATOR : -H,  K, -K-L
REMARK   3      TWIN FRACTION : 0.191
REMARK   3      TWIN DOMAIN   :    3
REMARK   3      TWIN OPERATOR : -H, -K,  K+L
REMARK   3      TWIN FRACTION : 0.198
REMARK   3      TWIN DOMAIN   :    4
REMARK   3      TWIN OPERATOR :  H, -K, -L
REMARK   3      TWIN FRACTION : 0.304
REMARK   3
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  TLS DETAILS
REMARK   3   NUMBER OF TLS GROUPS  : NULL
REMARK   3
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  BULK SOLVENT MODELLING.
REMARK   3   METHOD USED :  MASK
REMARK   3   PARAMETERS FOR MASK CALCULATION
REMARK   3   VDW PROBE RADIUS   :   1.40
REMARK   3   ION PROBE RADIUS   :   0.80
REMARK   3   SHRINKAGE RADIUS   :   0.80
REMARK   3
REMARK   3  OTHER REFINEMENT REMARKS:
REMARK   3  HYDROGENS HAVE BEEN ADDED IN THE RIDING POSITIONS
REMARK   3  U VALUES      : REFINED INDIVIDUALLY
REMARK   3
SSBOND   1 CYS A    3    CYS A   24
SSBOND   2 CYS A   17    CYS A   41
SSBOND   3 CYS A   43    CYS A   54
SSBOND   4 CYS A   55    CYS A   60
SSBOND   5 CYS B    3    CYS B   24
SSBOND   6 CYS B   17    CYS B   41
SSBOND   7 CYS B   43    CYS B   54
SSBOND   8 CYS B   55    CYS B   60
CRYST1   18.232   39.633   77.526 104.82  90.08  90.04 P 1                      
SCALE1      0.054849  0.000038  0.000087        0.00000                         
SCALE2      0.000000  0.025232  0.006677        0.00000                         
SCALE3      0.000000  0.000000  0.013343        0.00000 





>when you say that the Rfree is 0.4, what statistic are you quoting? For all of 
>your data or the highest shell It is clear from the data reduction statistics 
>that your data do not go to 1.57 angstroms.  There are no data at that 
>resolution.  The <I> is 1/2 of the error; <I> 24 and error about 40.  The 
>Rmerge for the shell is 59% which is close enough to random for me to have 
>little confidence in it.   
>It would help us if you just cut and paste the statistics into the question. 
>You are right, the density looks great. There is something funny about the 
>statistics if this is a normal 2fo-fc map.
>cheers,
>-ed collins
>
>On Jul 18, 2010, at 10:39 PM, 孙庆祥 wrote:
>
>> <Density over model.png>
>

Reply via email to