Dear Fred and Phil, However there is no refinement of these parameters in XSCALE so if you need to scale together several crystals (e.g. very small crystals that show severe radiation damage after a few degrees) you end up with a sub-optimal combined dataset after XSCALE. I thought SCALA can take care of that and define cell parameters that fit best all data as scalepack does when it considers all separate frames , from all crystals where-as the input to XSCALE is not separate frames but complete datasets).
Peter. On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Frederic VELLIEUX < frederic.velli...@orange.fr> wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Indeed it does, both during integration (INTEGRATE, only if you "ask for > it" with the proper keyword) and in the post-refinement step (CORRECT). > Normally this should be quite sufficient. I haven't seen a single case where > this was not sufficient. > > Fred. > > > Message du 25/04/10 09:55 > > De : "Phil Evans" > > A : CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > > Copie à : > > Objet : Re: [ccp4bb] SUMMARY: scala and xds data > > > > > > > Just to point out that Scala does not refine cell parameters: I believe > XDS does > > > > Phil > > -- Peter
