Dear Claudia, 

 

Though not a fixed rule, here are a few general things that we consider:

-          N- and C-termini of homologs (eg from BLAST)

-          Secondary structure predictions 

-          Disorder prediction (eg disembl or grooms servers)

-          Limited proteolysis to experimentally detect floppy ends 

 

Try to accumulate as much information as possible to guide your construct
design. In case of limited proteolysis: sometimes the truncated pieces are
too short to be revealed on an SDS-PAGE. You may need mass spec to reveal
cutting.

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards,
Dr. Alexander Pautsch 

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
A Leitstrukturfindung
Tel.: +49 (7351) 54-4683
Fax: +49 (7351) 54-97924 
mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> 

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein;
Registergericht Mainz: HR A 22206; Komplementär Boehringer Ingelheim
Deutschland GmbH; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Engelbert Günster (Vorsitzender),
Ralf Gorniak, Felix Gutsche, Mark Hagmann,  Dr. Martin Wanning; Vorsitzender
des Aufsichtsrates: Engelbert Tjeenk Willink; Sitz: Ingelheim am Rhein;
Registergericht Mainz: HR B 23260

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Sie kann besonderem rechtlichen
Schutz unterliegen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind, senden Sie
bitte diese E-Mail an den Absender zurück, löschen die eingegangene E-Mail
und geben den Inhalt der E-Mail nicht weiter. Jegliche unbefugte Bearbeitung,
Nutzung, Vervielfältigung oder Verbreitung ist verboten. / This e-mail is
confidential and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please reply to sender, delete the e-mail and do not disclose its
contents to any person. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, copying or
distribution is strictly prohibited.

Von: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
Claudia Scotti
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 12:46
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [ccp4bb] Off-topic - Domain termini for construct design

 

 
Dear All,
 
I'd like to espress a protein for crystallisation as a whole, but also to try
separate expression of its two domains.
 
Although prediciting domain boundaires is not difficult, I know that it is
worthwhile testing several constructs to improve espression in soluble form.
In several works I've seen that the choice is to keep or give up some
aminoacids (for example 4 or 5) at the N and/or C-termini and to test them to
see which expresses best.
 
I was wondering if there are defined  "rules" to choose these variants and/or
to modify the N and C termini of a protein of interest when it is not
important to keep them "true" (=native) in order to optimise expression
levels.  
 
Is there any good reference about this, please?
 
Personal experiences are welcome.
 
Many thanks,
 
Claudia


Claudia Scotti Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale Sezione di Patologia
Generale Universita' di Pavia Piazza Botta, 10 27100 Pavia Italia Tel. 0039
0382 986335/8/1 Facs 0039 0382 303673




________________________________

Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.
<https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969> 

Reply via email to