Are these things really cost-effective? That is, compared to the cost of simply posting a list of evil salts like Mg ammonium phosphate on the wall and testing a few duds in the x-ray beam? Phoebe
---- Original message ---- >Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:59:23 -0500 >From: Gabriel Birrane <gbirr...@bidmc.harvard.edu> >Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] UV microscope for screening >To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK > >I received this in the mail today. You may be interested. > >http://www.fmpproducts.com > >They have products for crystallography > > >On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 11:28 -0500, Scott Walsh wrote: >> Dear CCP4BB members, >> >> I am shopping around for a UV microscope for the lab and would like to get some feedback >> about peoples' experiences using UV microscopes for screening crystals. >> >> Best, >> >> Scott >> >> ********************************************************* >> Scott T. R. Walsh, Ph.D. >> Assistant Professor >> Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology >> University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute >> Rm 3127E CARB II >> 9600 Gudelsky Drive >> Rockville, MD 20850 >> email: wal...@umbi.umd.edu >> phone: (240) 314-6478 >> fax: (240) 314-6255- >> Phoebe A. Rice Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology The University of Chicago phone 773 834 1723 http://bmb.bsd.uchicago.edu/Faculty_and_Research/01_Faculty/01_Faculty_Alphabetically.php?faculty_id=123 RNA is really nifty DNA is over fifty We have put them both in one book Please do take a really good look http://www.rsc.org/shop/books/2008/9780854042722.asp
