There are two problems, I think

1. Sending a simple mail like this in anything other than plain text is wasteful, and also enforces the sender's way of displaying it on the reader, rather than following the reader's preference. (That may of course be appropriate in some cases where formatting is important, but not in this context)

2. Messages such as Norman's (and others), which seem to come from Outlook Express or Exchange Server, specify a font size 3D2 (whatever that means) which comes out too small to read, at least for me

The html line is:-
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">

<Luddite> What's wrong with plain text? </Luddite>

Phil

On 15 Sep 2009, at 10:34, Ian Tickle wrote:


Phil

I had this same problem a while ago, if you recall.  Modern e-mail
clients sending a message in HTML format will almost certainly send it
in 2 parts, the first a version converted to plain text and the second
the original HTML version (and possibly other versions of the same
message).  This is the 'MIME multipart alternative' e-mail standard
which is designed so that e-mail clients or users reading the message
can choose the version they want to display.  To quote from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIME#Alternative : "Systems can then choose
the "best" representation they are capable of processing; in general,
this will be the last part that the system can understand".

So assuming your mail client is MIME-compatible (I would have thought
that all modern clients are) there should be an option on your mail
reader (as there is on mine) to always display the plain text version.

Cheers

-- Ian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk [mailto:owner- ccp...@jiscmail.ac.uk]
On
Behalf Of Phil Evans
Sent: 15 September 2009 09:59
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] attachments

while we're on this topic, it would be nice also if messages were sent
in plain text, not as html (like yours, Norman :-)), particularly as
these ones  generally come out in a tiny font in my (Apple) mail
reader, for some reason

Phil


On 15 Sep 2009, at 09:45, Stein, Norman (STFC,DL,CSE) wrote:

In the past month there have been several postings to the BB with
large
(100kB or more) attachments. Can I remind subscribers that it is our
policy to discourage attachments as, amongst other things, they can
cause mailboxes to fill at an alarming rate. A link to a website
carrying the data which would otherwise appear in the attachment, is
more appropriate.

Norman Stein
CCP4

--
Scanned by iCritical.




Disclaimer
This communication is confidential and may contain privileged information intended solely for the named addressee(s). It may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. If you are not the intended recipient you must not review, use, disclose, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Astex Therapeutics Ltd by emailing i.tic...@astex-therapeutics.com and destroy all copies of the message and any attached documents. Astex Therapeutics Ltd monitors, controls and protects all its messaging traffic in compliance with its corporate email policy. The Company accepts no liability or responsibility for any onward transmission or use of emails and attachments having left the Astex Therapeutics domain. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this message are those of the individual sender and not of Astex Therapeutics Ltd. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of computer viruses. Astex Therapeutics Ltd accepts no liability for damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. E-mail is susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, and tampering, Astex Therapeutics Ltd only send and receive e-mails on the basis that the Company is not liable for any such alteration or any consequences thereof. Astex Therapeutics Ltd., Registered in England at 436 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0QA under number 3751674


Reply via email to