hi BertThank you for your reply. Your are right about the values for your 
Pattersons and NatFourier, but the systematic absences and pointless suggested 
me to be P6122 and according to mathews coeff i get   1 molecule with 
Vm=  2.06 solvent=  40.42. My protein has two SeMet sites so i 
searched for two sites. I have just pasted few reflections which showed me P61. 
then based on pointless i tried P6122   0   0   
3     1.9     
1.8     0.5     1.8   
0   0   4     
0.0     2.7     
1.1     2.5   0   0   
5     0.4     3.5    
-0.5     3.3   0   0   
6   427.5    33.6   399.9    
30.3   0   0   7    
14.3     5.9     
4.0     4.8   0   0   
8     1.5     5.8    
-4.4     6.3   0   0   
9    10.8     6.7    
-2.1     7.5   0   0  
10     7.0     
7.3     1.5     7.2   
0   0  11    -3.8     
9.3    -2.7     8.4   
0   0  12   201.7    19.1   
198.6    19.8   0   0  
13    22.5     9.6    
12.5     9.9   0   0  
14     2.9    10.7     
0.0     8.5   0   0  
15   -21.0    12.6     
1.4    12.1   0   0  
16    -1.6    12.6    
10.8    12.3   0   0  18  
6649.0   474.7  6423.4   460.5   
0   0  19    -4.6    
16.5    -8.5    15.1   0   
0  20   -44.1    17.0   
-16.3    16.7   0   0  
21    34.6    20.7    
61.8    18.5   0   0  22   
-16.7    12.5   -15.4    
15.9   0   0  23   -46.2    
18.7   -35.9    18.2 pointless resultsBest 
Solution     space group P 61 2 2   Reindex 
operator:                  
 
[h,k,l]                
    Laue group 
probability:            
 1.000   Systematic absence probability:     
0.963   Total 
probability:                 
 0.963   Space group 
confidence:            
 0.949   Laue group 
confidence              
 1.000thank youEthayathullaOn Thu, 21 May 2009 19:44:27 -0400 "Bert Van Den 
Berg"  wrote      Re: [ccp4bb] MAD phasing      Hi,    My guess is that you 
don’t have the right space group. The values for your Pattersons and NatFourier 
are way too low, especially the NatFourier you would like to be at least 2-3 or 
so. In your assigned space group, do you have a reasonable value for  the 
matthews coefficient? Is there NCS? Are you finding the expected number of Se 
sites?  Again, I would try to investigate alternative SGs.    Also it would be 
a good idea to take the sites and refine them with SHARP.    Good luck, Bert    
  On 5/21/09 6:38 PM, "Ethayathulla Abdulsamath"  wrote:    hello    I am have 
a MAD dataset collected upto 2.3A but anomalous signal is upto 3.5A. The 
dataset is in P6 and based on pointless and absences it is P6122. Overall 
Rlin/rsym is (0.07/ 0.06). the overall redundancy is 10. I have two Se peaks, i 
used solve/resolve to find those peaks. I used datasets from 3.5 to 20A to find 
peaks i got two good peaks of occ (1.4 & 0.92). I did analyze_solve and 
refined those peaks. Then i tried resolve to autobuild and phasing but it didnt 
work. The r-factor FC vs FP is 0.40 and FOM 0.6, although the results looks 
promising i couldnt find proper phasing using phenix, resolve.autobuild. 
 i tried phenix.autosol also but it didnt work. how can i check the peaks 
are real.  can anybody suggest me how do I proceed further and what r the 
mistakes i am doing..    Thank you   Ethayathulla  FROM SOLVE    Site 
   x       y 
      z       occ 
      B     -- PEAK 
 HEIGHT --      1   0.386   0.986 
  0.050   1.449  60.000 
            23.82  
    2   0.623   0.997   0.046 
  0.921  60.000 
            22.11  
 Summary of scoring for this solution:  
                           --
 over many solutions--    -- this solution --   Criteria 
                      MEAN
          SD 
        VALUE 
       Z-SCORE   Pattersons: 
                 0.129
        0.500 
       0.279 
       0.299   Cross-validation 
Fourier:     4.83 
        2.62 
        41.8 
        14.1   NatFourier CCx100: 
           3.28 
        1.24 
        3.93 
       0.521   Mean figure of 
meritx100:     0.00 
        7.16 
        53.5 
        7.48   Correction for 
Z-scores: 
                                           -10.5
     Overall Z-score value: 
                                              11.9
      RESOLVE results     CORRECTED OVERALL FIGURE OF MERIT OF PHASING: 
  0.61           *  
 *     ESTIMATED FRACTION OF PHASE INFORMATION FROM 
PRIOR:  0.39      *   * 
    ESTIMATED FRACTION OF PHASE INFORMATION FROM MAP: 
   0.61      *   * 
    NOTE: The fraction from prior will be roughly 
proportional to  *       Overall average CC: 
  0.5423778   Results of wilson scaling of model Fc to Fo :  
 Scale on I to apply to Fc =      1.934  
 B-value to apply to Fc=      1.971  
 Overall R-factor for FC vs FP: 0.404 for 
      3288 reflections   Leaving out 
           1 
 reflections with FC=0 and correcting R-factor to    0.4036375  
  from   0.4035717      as only 
  99.96960     % of the reflections are ok  
 Writing overall R-factor   0.4036375 
     to "resolve.rfactor"                  
###################################################  A.S.Ethayathulla,Ph.D.  
Department of Biophysics  All India Institute of Medical Sciences  Ansari Nagar 
 New Delhi-110029  India.  ###################################################  
                


###################################################
A.S.Ethayathulla,Ph.D.
Department of Biophysics
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar
New Delhi-110029
India.
###################################################

Reply via email to