Dear all,
The MALLS instruments on-line with an FPLC and with an RI detector,
should provide an 'absolute MW', shape independent,
and indeed in our hands they do well. Until yesterday, where a 21kD
protein pretends to be 25 kD. We did the mass spec
anyway, and its 21kD as we expected to the residue, but I am still
puzzled by that result.
One central assumption for the MALLS formulas, is that dn/dc, the
specific refractive index increment, is constant for unmodified
proteins,
made by aa with no sugars etc. Literature suggests dn/dc values for
proteins to be constant and between 0.189/0.190 is a good value,
with minimal buffer dependence for aqueous buffers with 'the usual'
salts.
I am a rather bad physicist, but my reading tells me that dn/dc, and
thus light scattering, depends to the "laser-light induced dipole in
the molecule". Is there any reason to believe that in theory a
molecule with a very particular charge distribution (eg a small DNA
binding protein which is already a 'dipole') would have significantly
different dn/dc values? Is anyone aware of such an experiment?
Literature searches were in vain ...
Best -
Tassos
- [ccp4bb] off topic - static laser light scattering Anastassis Perrakis
-