Is there a chance that  ThDP (TDP or TPP in the ccp4 dictionary) is restrained  
differently in 6.1.x than it used to be in 6.02 or even earlier versions (e.g. 
5.2) ? 

         Boaz

----- Original Message -----
From: Eleanor Dodson <c...@ysbl.york.ac.uk>
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:17
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] nad woes
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

> Even for NAD I think I would make my own "new" dictionary.
> 
> If you go to the ebi site ( now pdbe) ask for Msdchem ( is it 
> PDBeChem 
> now?)
> Get the idealised NAD coordinates with the remediated nomenclature
> Submit the coordnates to the ProDrg server.
> Retrieve the REFMAC dictionary
> 
> Use PDB and dictionary in Coot to fit the ligand..
> 
>  Eleanor
> 
> 
> 
>  Get back an idealised dictionary Jan Abendroth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > is there any wisdom on NAD out there? I experience some 
> strange 
> > behaviour of this common cofactor.
> >
> > With moderately convincing density, probably low occupancy of 
> a 
> > cofactor that came along for the ride from E coli, 
> Refmac5.5.0088 
> > pulls the AN6 atom out of the adenine plane. With my own 
> library that 
> > puts planar restraints on the adenine ring this seems to be fixed.
> >
> > Coot during real space refinement or regularisation using 
> either the 
> > standard or my own dictionary handles the purine ring just 
> fine, 
> > however, totally garbles up the nicotineamide.
> >
> > Btw, I use the * nomenclature.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jan
> >
> > -- 
> > Jan Abendroth
> > deCODE biostructures
> > Seattle / Bainbridge Island WA, USA
> > work: JAbendroth_at_decode.is
> > home: Jan.Abendroth_at_gmail.com
> >
> >
> 

Boaz Shaanan, Ph.D.
Dept. of Life Sciences
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Beer-Sheva 84105
Israel
Phone: 972-8-647-2220 ; Fax: 646-1710
Skype: boaz.shaanan‎

Reply via email to