Dear Eleanor,
That is a useful suggestion, but in the case of 3ftt it would not have
helped: the amplitudes would have looked as healthy as can be (they were
calculated!), and it was the associated Sigmas that had absurd values, being
in fact phases in degrees. A sanity check on some (recalculated) I/sig(I)
statistics could have detected that something was fishy.
Looking forward to the archiving of the REAL data ... i.e. the images.
Using any other form of "data" is like having to eat out of someone else's
dirty plate!
With best wishes,
Gerard.
--
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:22:26AM +0000, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> It would be possible for the deposition sites to run a few simple tests to
> at least find cases where intensities are labelled as amplitudes or vice
> versa - the truncate plots of moments and cumulative intensities at least
> would show something was wrong.
>
> Eleanor
>
--
===============================================================
* *
* Gerard Bricogne g...@globalphasing.com *
* *
* Global Phasing Ltd. *
* Sheraton House, Castle Park Tel: +44-(0)1223-353033 *
* Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK Fax: +44-(0)1223-366889 *
* *
===============================================================
