hi
i am working on crystallisation of a 42 kDa his tag protein but,my protein gets 
precipitated at higher concenrtration till now i have not tried any salt to 
stabilise the protein,i am just confused what to do???should i go for higher 
salt concentration or anything alse.

-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board on behalf of Raphael Gasper
Sent: Tue 2/24/2009 9:56 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Off topic: Mammalian gene expression in E. coli
 
This website is quite useful (via Expasy):

http://gcua.schoedl.de/

Raphael



Mo Wong schrieb:
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I've checked my sequence for rare codons; however, what would be 
> useful to a pseudo-molecular biologist like me is a web server which 
> will look at your input DNA sequence and guesstimate the success of 
> expression in E. coli (i.e., consider codon frequency). Does one 
> exist? Even better, a web server that offers the choice of different 
> commercial forms of E. coli (i.e., Rosetta and Codon+)? I tried 
> Googling this a few days ago and didn't find anything too useful?
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:00 AM, <ar...@xtals.org 
> <mailto:ar...@xtals.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     The question you have to ask yourself first is - does my gene actually
>     *have* the rare codons that you're trying to avoid? Experience
>     shows that
>     usually it's not single codons that are a problem but pairs or
>     triplets of
>     rare ones. If your gene does not have obviously bad codon
>     combinations you
>     still may derive a benefit from codon optimization and especially from
>     mRNA structure shuffling. There are articles out there that attempt to
>     present statistically significant evidence and I tend to agree
>     with them -
>     the practice of optimizing codon usage AND mRNA structure is a
>     good and
>     useful one.
>
>     >From what you describe, you're working with a kinase. It is not
>     at all
>     uncommon to have toxicity of kinases for E. coli. Additional issues
>     include heterogenous phosphorylation if the kinase is normally
>     active or
>     can auto-activate in E.coli (classical example is PKA which can
>     phosphorylate itself in up to 30 places given the right conditions).
>
>     Toxicity isn't difficult to spot - classical signs include
>     microcolonies,
>     heterogenous colonies, slow growth, plasmid instability and so on.
>     Even
>     with a native gene you would likely notice these symptoms to some
>     extent.
>
>     Incidentally - toxicity usually equals folding, i.e. for a kinase
>     to be
>     toxic at least some of it has to be folded enough to work. This is
>     actually *good news* because toxicity can be combated on a
>     different level
>     than lack of folded expression. For example, co-expression with
>     phosphatases tends to work miracles for kinase-based toxicity.
>
>     Finally, to answer your question directly - yes, i've seen several
>     cases
>     of proteins not expressing even with rare codon tRNA supplemented in
>     trans, but expressing well from optimized DNA. Again - optimized for
>     codons AND structure, as I've never separated the two processes.
>
>     Synthetic DNA is cheap these days. If you can afford it - it's
>     useful to
>     try before taking the next step. In this case the obvious next step is
>     attempt at expression in insect cells - kinases usually work out
>     really
>     well in IC.
>
>     Artem
>
>

-- 
Raphael Gasper-Schönenbrücher
Max-Planck-Institut für molekulare Physiologie
Abt. für strukturelle Biologie
Otto-Hahn-Straße 11
44227 Dortmund, Germany
Tel: +49/231/133-2121
Fax: +49/231/133-2199


Reply via email to