I agree with Bill.

After a few minutes thinking, in between "jobs working in the yard":

It depends if you need to understand "everything" (I guess that's impossible 
these days) --- are you comfortable with publishing and defending research 
results that you do not understand? I am not. In quite a few labs there are 
crystallographers available who understand and can make sure that they can 
defend the results/science. If you have such people on staff, I guess (but 
don't like the sound of it) that you can treat macromolecular crystallography 
as a "service" and you can focus on other things. But you cannot (should not) 
publish or defend things you do not understand.

A little more involved is the answer "what if the problem is too difficult for 
standard approaches"? We tend to see a lot of those. Problems where you have to 
sit and think because all "standard" approaches do not work. Of course these 
problems cannot be solved without a thorough understanding of standard problems 
and procedures.

My $0.02 (soon to be $-0.02)

Mark 


 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: William G. Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Sent: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 3:44 pm
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Crystallogrphy today









On Sep 20, 2008, at 2:18 PM, Jayashankar wrote:?
?

> Dear friends and crystallographers,?
?

Are they mutually exclusive??
?

>?

>?

> During One of my lab meeting ,?

>?

> I told twinning in crystals are ok, because ccp4's recent releases > just 
> need?

> the keyword TWIN to solve them,?
?

I believe the closer you get to complete twinning, the more intractable the 
problem gets. I don't know if the pain scales linearly with twinning fraction.?
?

>?

>?

> As a new generation research student, I am now confused,?
?

This is both normal and proper, but has nothing to do with generation.?
?

> is that I need to?

> learn and understand all programs(so many...but research does not  > mean?

> relaying on them)?

> to solve my crystallographic problems(is that all)....?

> if you see all the queries in ccp4BB is just about undocumented or?

> misunderstood program oriented questions.?
?

Actually there are many lively discussions about fundamental problems.  These 
will often arise in the context of a specific program, but you still have to 
understand the problem the program is designed to solve.?

>?

>?

> is  that all i have to learn in crystallography in future.?
?

That's up to you, but I would say no.  Learn the fundamentals. Programs will 
come and go.?
?

>?

> Still upto what limitations we are now in crystallography.?

> this is my very naive and prime question.?

>?

> 1.Phase problem?
?

This is still "the" problem. Some inroads have been made toward ab initio 
solutions, but the traditional heavy-atom methods, variations like MAD phasing, 
and molecular replacement remain in practice the standard approaches for what 
you usually find in the PDB.?
?

>?

> 2.twin problem?
?

see above.?
?

>?

> 3.solving intrinsically disordered proteins?
?

Crystals give a spatial average, so there is nothing magical you can do to 
overcome intrinsic disorder.?

>?

> 4.hetro multimeric proteins?
?

ribosomes are I think the current upper bound?
?

>?

> 5.high order oligomers?
?

Chromatin fibers maybe??
?

>?

> 6.cryo crystallography?
?

This is routine.?
?

>?

> 7.automation in high through put crystallography?
?

The main problem is finding strong enough amphetamines to keep one awake while 
reading the papers.?
?

>?

> 8.radiation damage?
?

see cryocrystallography, and take lots of vitamin C?

>?

> 9.kinetic crystallography?
?

Laue?  There is now a fair body of work, but development for irreversible 
enzyme systems is probably a worthwhile future goal.?
?

>?

> 10. crystal growth research (antigravity, pressure )?
?

Anti-gravity??
?

>?

> 11.stereo graphics?
?

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed Macintosh user is king (as long as the 
program is not X-windows-based).?

>?

>?

> if i am right all the above has been studied (....what we are not > clear?

> still about them),?

>?

> I need an answer to motivate me in doing my research in > Crystallography.?

>?

> S.Jayashankar?

> (A confused new generation research student)?

> Research Student?

> Institute for Biophysical Chemistry?

> Hannover Medical School?

> Germany.?



 

Reply via email to