I would use all the data myself and report that the model was built from a
a dataset with 74% completeness in the 2.25 to 2.15 Anngstrom shell. I
would not put the number 2.15 A in the manuscript title nor in the poster
title.
For me the acceptable completeness is 90% in the highest resolution shell
for the number to get in the title. You will know I reviewed your
paper if you see my telltale reviewer comment. You can put whatever you
want in the PDB deposition field.
Jim
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Melody Lin wrote:
Hi all,
I have always been wondering... for a data set diffracting to say
2.15Angstrom but in the highest resolution shell (
2.25-2.15) the completeness is 74%, should I use merge all the data and call
it a 2.15 A dataset or I should cut the data set to say 2.25 A where the
highest resolution shell has better completeness (>85%)? What is an
acceptable completeness value for the highest resolution shell?
Thank you.
Best,
Melody
