pointless now does this
Phil
On 11 Jan 2008, at 11:05, Frank von Delft wrote:
There's a way to avoid having to do this - use the "ADD" sub-
keyword when processing in Mosflm, so that the batch number for
each image data is given an offset; see
Nevertheless, it *is* a right-royal pain in the arse: you're
cruising at the synchrotron, crystal collecting and quietly (or
noisily) dying, you want a quick scale to know whether you have
enough data from your second batch .... and scala craps at you for
having the repeating batch number.
Can't the merging process (pointless; sortmtz) be made to spot that
batch numbers are repeating, and do an automatic add based on
filename? After all, batches from the same range *always* end up in
the same unmerged mtz file (or files with the same template).
At least, I was able to write a csh script to do it, and if you can
do it in csh, you can do it in anything... :)
phx.
