Offering a selection of space groups compatible with a point group will not require reindexing. Some point groups of course permit reindexing, but one hope you have chosen a consistent set as you combine data sets into an MTZ file - pointless and the GUI both offer ways to check this.Phasing cannot be carried out till you have chosen a spacegroup, and any existing phase associated data should probably be weeded out as part of a "Assign Spacegroup" function.Eleanor Kevin Cowtan wrote:This is great! But before we all get carried away, a quick reality check is in order. This isn't an area I've thought about, but my limited understanding raises the following issues....Given that an MTZ file contains a cell, an indexing of the data, and possibly phases involving a choice of origin, the use of an MTZ file immediately implies that some decision has been made about the spacegroup.Selecting a different spacegroup from a list of possibilities may involve reindexing, and/or changing origin/enantiomorph dependent properties such as phases and HLs.It would be possible for an MTZ file to say something like this:'This file is generated assuming spacegroup X. Spacegroups X1, X2, X3, X4, X5.... are also possible.'.It should also be possible to compute on the fly whether a particular column type needs to be modified for a different spacegroup.How will we present this in user interfaces? As a starting point, until a spacegroup has been settled upon, the user will need the option of picking the spacegroup after having selected the MTZ. This means potentially a reindexing step added to every single task - messy. As an intermediate, being able to change the 'currently selected' spacegroup as a separate task would be an improvement.Phil Evans wrote:I agree On 9 Nov 2007, at 13:50, Eleanor Dodson wrote:As I often say!!! The mtz format should carry point group and alternate SGs - then be upgraded when youknow the correct SG..Eleanor Phil Evans wrote:It just picks the first in the list, to store in the output MTZ file, which can only handle one (92 < 96)Phil On 8 Nov 2007, at 22:26, Bryan W. Lepore wrote:when pointless (1.2.0) finds enantiomorphic SG's, what is the criterion for 'Selecting' one over the other?e.g. i ran pointless on some tetragonal data, and the enantiomorphs SG92/SG96 are selected as strong candidatesSpacegroup TotProb SysAbsProb Reindex Conditions <P 41 21 2> ( 92) 0.956 0.956 00l: l=4n, h00: h=2n (zones 1,2) <P 43 21 2> ( 96) 0.956 0.956 00l: l=4n, h00: h=2n (zones 1,2)... then pointless reports : Selecting space group P 41 21 2 as solutions are enantiomorphic Best Solution space group P 41 21 2... is that b/c pointless can only report one, and SG92 came up first?-bryan
Of course, you may need to re-index even if you have the right space
group...
- [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantiomorphic SG's Bryan W. Lepore
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantiomorphic ... Phil Evans
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantiomorp... Eleanor Dodson
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantio... Phil Evans
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and ena... Martyn Winn
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and ena... Winter, G (Graeme)
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and ena... Kevin Cowtan
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) an... Winter, G (Graeme)
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) an... Eleanor Dodson
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0... Harry Powell
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0... Kevin Cowtan
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1... Ian Tickle
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and enantio... Ian Tickle
- Re: [ccp4bb] pointless (1.2.0) and ena... Garib Murshudov