Dear Bryan, dear all !

Low initial FOM in many senses are good [..] because density modification has more latitude

Sorry for being late with my remark :

some theoretical results directly answering Bryan's practical question are discussed by Lunin & Woolfson (1993) in Acta Cryst., D49, 530-533. Of course it is supposed that mean phase error (or FOM) estimation is correct (that is often not the case). Also the result is statistical and in practice the situation may vary from one particular crystal to another.

Regards,

Sacha

Reply via email to