On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:13:29PM +0100, Phil Evans wrote: > What do you count as raw data? Rawest are the images - everything > beyond that is modellling - but archiving images is _expensive_!
Maybe we should contact Google to let them do it for us ;-) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6425975.stm I doubt every crystallographer would want access to all raw datasets - but for developers it would be ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC (similar to things like the JCSG archive). And just imagine all those well collected datasets of > 10 years ago and what we could learn from those (and the better structures we could determine) with the modern tools and programs ... Clemens -- *************************************************************** * Clemens Vonrhein, Ph.D. vonrhein AT GlobalPhasing DOT com * * Global Phasing Ltd. * Sheraton House, Castle Park * Cambridge CB3 0AX, UK *-------------------------------------------------------------- * BUSTER Development Group (http://www.globalphasing.com) ***************************************************************
