Isn't this e-mail's topic and it's appearance contradict each other? It comes from William Scott's e-mail account, but signed as coming from Paul Emsley. How do we figure out who actually wrote this e-mail with or without control access. The easiest way is to assume that it is coming from Bill, he just decided to sign as a Paul to disprove his own point. On the other way, it is only 7:30 am in Santa Cruz, then it is unlikely to be Bill, which means that e-mail was sent by Paul. Worth looking at this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_Holmes Wiki page, isn't it?
Vaheh Oganesyan -----Original Message----- From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Scott Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 10:12 AM To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] CCP4 Wiki Most of us register on the CCP4 bb with our own names. If we say something stupid, it damages our reputation in front of our peers. A similar approach can be used for the Wiki. Control access, and limit it only to people who register with their own name and who are registered to the ccp4 bb. -- Paul Emsley Kay Diederichs wrote: > Anastassis Perrakis schrieb: >> Kay - disagreeing once was enough ... so: >> >> I share your thoughts about the wiki ! >> >> However, the dynamics of Wikipedia are an interesting issue and relate >> to 'vandalism'.
