Hi Pete,

The sigmaa-weighing scheme implemented in SigmaA routine is the very means to remove the potential model bias. Also, the model phases we used in the phase combination were simply from a backbone poly-Ala model generated from the best parts of the MAD-phased density (some of them from an ARP/wARP run) leaving out the surface regions where the map quality is marginal. Combining partial model phases with the experimental phases has been used as a way to improve the map quality while the partial model is still far from complete and most of the side chains are not yet filled in. Once enough scattering mass has been built into the model and a reciprocal space refinement with CNS or REFMAC is warranted, the resulting 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps are often having much suprior quality for the further model building.

One drawback of combining partial model phases with the density-modified experimental phases is that one cannot run the density modification second time after the combination. I have not tested whether combining model phases with the density modified MAD phases produces good quality map (experts in the field can make comments). I did get significant improvement in the map quality with the combine-then-modify procedure.

HTH,

Huiying

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Peter Adrian Meyer wrote:

structure" running mode of SIGMAA. This is the run we really wanted to
combine
the model phases with the MAD phases before going through further
density
modifications with SOLOMON or DM.

I would have thought that you'd want to do this the other way around
(density modification on MAD before model phase combination) in order to
reduce possible model bias.

I'm curious...what's the reasoning for doing the model phase combination
first?

Pete


Pete Meyer
Fu Lab
BMCB grad student
Cornell University





--
-------------------------------------------------
Huiying Li, Ph. D
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry
Natural Sciences I, Rm 2443
University of California at Irvine
Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Tel: 949-824-4322(or -1953);  Fax: 949-824-3280
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to