As has been suggested, you can try
other hosts - for instance Gram positive bacteria (Bacillus megaterium is an
interesting host as are other bacilli, especially if your protein is
secreted), other Gram negative bacteria (Pseudomonas for instance),

Can anyone comment on availability of Archaea expression systems?
Based on available structures, it would appear that their chaperons
are much more similar to eukaryotic one than anything present in
eubacteria. For a long time, I've been puzzling over why there is
still no popular/workable Archaea expression system. Reason?

yeasts
(Pichia, Hansenula, Yarrowia, Klyveromyces), insect cells (Trichoplusia or
Spodoptera - they're different!)

I've compared Sf9/Sf21 and High5 cells for many, many baculoviruses
and have yet to find a difference that would ultimately matter.
One clear difference is that Trichoplusia/High5 seem to require less
virus to get to the same level of expression - but that level is
exactly the same as what Sf9 give at higher pfu/cell infections. So
the benefit is only felt by people who failed to amplify their
virus properly. Same with regard to solubility. Some of the proteins
I've dealt with misfold (partially or completely) even in insect
cells but back to back comparison of High5 and Sf9 showed no
difference. Trichoplusia are a lot more difficult to get growing
in suspensions without horrible clumping.

mammalian cells (dozens of options there
too)

All of them are essentially equivalent = pathetic, as far as
overexpression is concerned. One exception though: transient
expression in Cos-1 cells. It's not a system one can do on a
large scale but the amount of protein/cell is 10-20X higher
than constitutive expression and thus it can be appropriate to
to get enough material for limited proteolysis or biochemical
assays that don't require lots of protein.

, or cell-free expression. If you're truly desperate you can try
expression in more esoteric hosts such as plant roots, algi, parasites
(Leishmania), whole insect larvae, animals (milk), and so forth.

Dictyostelium discoideum (slime mold) deserves honorary mention
here. Its cultures are nearly as cheap as E.coli, it grows almost
as fast as yeasts, it doies not have funky post-translational
processing yeasts frequently do, and it gives at least as much protein
as common mammalian expression systems. The drawback is its weird codon
usage but with the gene synthesis prices coming down fast it's fast
becoming a viable option.

I got enclusion body in many cases when I tried to express human
proteins in E coli. I would like some suggestions on how to go about
it. I would also like to try co-expression of GroEL/GroES or
DnaJ/DnaK, and would like to know where to get the plasmids.

IMHO, if you don't get *any* soluble expression at all in minimal
medium expressing at 16C, the chances that anything you do in E.coli
will magically make soluble protein are slim to none. If, however,
there is *some* folding but it inefficient, then, As Artem mentioned,
there is a long list of options you can consider...

Good luck,

Dima

Reply via email to