I just figure it out,

I needed to add new Primary tunnel 0 which is traversing the link between R1
and R2 with ERO next hop of R2 loopback and used tunnel 1 to backup tunnel 0
on the gig1/0/0.120.

I extended the failure detection with ip rsvp signaling hello bfd with 50ms
and 150 dead timer.

I would like to compare the convergence speed between tweaked ospf lsa
throttling and the same config plus traffic-eng fast-rerout. it should make
some different because ospf need to purge the route from the RIP and install
the secondary path from the database to the RIP. in the case of fast-rerout
the LSP is ready to serve and doesn't need to be computed. does that make
sense!

Will send an update after the test is carried-out.


2011/6/24 Abdel el Anazi <[email protected]>

> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to setup in lab Link-Protection but I'm facing some issues
> it's doesn't seems to work probably,
>
> keep saying that *Cannot select backup for TE tunnel that is associated as
> a backup*
> Does that mean that I can't use link-protection on the PLR node can anyone
> explain please.
>
> the topology is
>
> R1 ---------------------------- R2
>  |                                 |
>  |                                 |
> R3 ---------------------------- R4
>
> Trying to protect the link between R1 and R2 on the R1 so R1 is the PLR and
> the ERO for the tunnel is towards R1 ->R3->R4->R2 Loopback0
>
>
> this is my config:
>
> interface Vlan999
>  Desc This will be used incase gi1/0/0.120 fail
>  mpls ip
>  mpls traffic-eng tunnels
>  ip rsvp bandwidth 256000 256000
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet1/0/0.120
>  Des Protected Link
>  mpls ip
>  mpls traffic-eng tunnels
>  mpls traffic-eng backup-path Tunnel1
>  ip rsvp bandwidth 256000 256000
>  ip rsvp signalling hello
>  ip rsvp signalling hello refresh interval 50
> !
> interface Tunnel1
>  ip unnumbered Loopback0
>  tunnel source Loopback0
>  tunnel mode mpls traffic-eng
>  tunnel destination 192.133.125.128
>  tunnel mpls traffic-eng path-option 10 explicit name B-LINK
>  tunnel mpls traffic-eng fast-reroute bw-protect
> !
> router ospf 65474
>  router-id 192.133.125.129
>  mpls traffic-eng router-id Loopback0
>  mpls traffic-eng area 0
> !
> ip explicit-path name B-LINK enable
>  next-address 192.133.125.145
>  next-address 192.133.125.144
>  next-address 192.133.125.128
>
>
> show debug
> IP RSVP debugging is on for:
>    fast-reroute state
>    fast-reroute signalling
>    fast-reroute errors
>    hello
>
>
> Jun 24 11:47:35.000 MET: %LDP-5-SP: 192.133.125.128:0: session recovery
> succeeded
>
> Jun 24 11:47:42.700 MET: %OSPF-5-ADJCHG: Process 65474, Nbr 192.133.125.128
> on GigabitEthernet1/0/0.120 from LOADING to FULL, Loading Done
>
> Jun 24 11:47:42.704 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_tpdb_node_change: topology data
> base node change: event: 4
> Jun 24 11:47:42.704 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_tpdb_node_change: Start FRR
> walk timer
> Jun 24 11:47:42.732 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_tpdb_node_change: topology data
> base node change: event: 4
> Jun 24 11:47:42.732 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_tpdb_node_change: walk timer is
> already running
>
> Jun 24 11:47:52.704 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_event_walk_timer_expired: RSVP
> FRR walk timer expired, walk all psbs
> Jun 24 11:47:52.704 MET: RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_scan_psbs:  -- examine all
> PSB's
> Jun 24 11:47:52.704 MET: RSVP-FRR
> 192.133.125.129_5->192.133.125.128_1[192.133.125.129]: rsvp_frr_prepare:
> Cannot select backup for TE tunnel that is associated as a backup
> Jun 24 11:47:52.704 MET: RSVP-FRR
> 192.133.125.129_5->192.133.125.128_1[192.133.125.129]: rsvp_frr_set_backup:
> prepare failed
> Jun 24 11:47:52.704 MET
> : RSVP-FRR: rsvp_frr_scan_psbs:  -- Finished
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and Looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Reply via email to