This was INE's SP bootcamp lab 2. I failed my first attempt pretty miserably back in June, so I've now been alternating between their labs and yours, and am scheduled to take your bootcamp on Feb 28th.
I feel much more prepared now but find my biggest flaw is in missing the ever-so-important little stuff. All too often there are small twists on the solutions that, if missed, will have no impact on functionality but will never-the-less result in a loss points. Once you miss one of those it becomes all but impossible to spot it in later verification. Thanks for your input! Eric On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote: > I suppose you are right. What lab was this? > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > FREE CCIE training: http://bit.ly/vLecture > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 06:10, Eric Rioux <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, > > I'm working on a lab where the requirement was: > > "Configure OSPF settings on the link between R1 and R3 so that only the > > minimal amount of LSA's are generated for this link." > > I configured it for flood reduction. The solution was to configure it as > > network type point-to-point. Now, if the solution had been to configure > it > > for both point-to-point AND flood reduction, maybe I'd understand. > > Don't point-to-point links still refresh LSA's periodically, thus making > > them send more LSA's than a link with flood reduction or demand circuit > > configured? > > Thanks, > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > > visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
