Hi,
I am doing Lab1 and doing Task 1.7:
Configure frame-relay traffic shaping on R6....
I wonder if it is ok to put the map class on the physical interface?
I have similar output with the the one in the WB:
Interface Se0/1
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active
625 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
624 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
622 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
615 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
614 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
604 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
Interface Se0/1.6
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active
602 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
Interface Se0/1.605
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active
605 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
Interface Se0/1.612
Access Target Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment Adapt
VC List Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes) Active
612 32000 1000 8000 4000 125 500 -
and why do I have so much DLCIs on ser0/1? no frame-relay inverse-arp is used
on that interface.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
