Hi Bryan,

Thanks for clarification.

Thanks,
Srinivas

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> wrote:

> Srinivas,
>
> If you are doing MP-EBGP between the ASBRs and using next-hop-self from the
> ASBRs to the internal peers, then you shouldn't need send-label at all. In
> this lab, NHS is configured in the PG so I think send-label is unnecessary.
>
> If you didn't use next-hop-self then you need to get that ASBR link into
> BGP and use send-label from ASBR to IBGP peers.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:08 PM, srinivas pv 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I am doing this lab and I have the following query. Please do the needful.
>>
>> This is inter-AS scenario, and the restriction is not to allow LDP on any
>> interconnecting links between networks.
>>
>> So we need to use send-label on the links between AS 100 and 200. Why do
>> we need to configure send-label for iBGP neighbors also?
>> Is interconnecting links means, here iBGP also?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Srinivas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to