Jose, Looks like the relevant log message is "Next ERO subobject 131.1.23.2 is strict but not adjacent" which is somewhat self-explanatory if it is correct. Explain your topology and addressing then maybe we can give more insight.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Jose Zamora <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys,, i was testing some MPLS TE scenarios, in one of my links i had a > ethernet link like point-to-multipoint. > > In this case the tunnel didnt come up,, > > the debug outputs are the following > > or updating received ERO (error code 2) > R6# > *Dec 20 07:17:39.723: RSVP 131.6.6.6_127->131.4.4.4_10[131.6.6.6]: Received > Path message from 131.6.6.6 (on sender host) > *Dec 20 07:17:39.727: RSVP: new path message passed parsing, continue... > *Dec 20 07:17:39.727: RSVP: Next ERO subobject 131.1.23.2 is strict but not > adjacent > *Dec 20 07:17:39.727: RSVP 131.6.6.6_127->131.4.4.4_10[131.6.6.6]: PATH: > Error updating received ERO (error code 2) > R6# > > if i changed the network type to brodacast the tunnel comes up . > > > Regards. > > > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
