Would you share your configuration on the 2 routers? It may get easier  
to debug.
All seems fine and labels/vc's are allocated. Have you tried reloading  
the routers?



-- 
Regards,

Rick Mur
CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On 10 nov 2009, at 18:57, Daniel Holme wrote:

> Hi
>
> R9 -- ATM1 -- R1
> (both links are cell-mode MPLS)
>
> I've got a weird problem in the lab where I can see LSP created  
> across the ATM links and I can ping R1 loopback to R9 loopback no  
> problems, and beyond, all labelled through LDP/OSPF. I can see the  
> bindings are correct for this in ATM1 and the VCI/VPI looks okay too:
>
> Rack1R9(config-vrf)#do sh mpls for  44.44.44.1
> Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next  
> Hop
> Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
> 18     1/33          44.44.44.1/32     0             AT3/0.1     
> point2point
>
> CellModeATM#sh mpls atm-ldp binding 44.44.44.1 32
> Destination: 44.44.44.1/32
>    Headend Router ATM1/0.1 (1 hop) 1/33  Active, VCD=60
>    Tailend Router ATM3/0.1 1/33 Active, VCD=102
>
> The problem is when I try to add a label to the stack. If I  
> provision a VPN in BGP and create loopbacks in this VPN on R1 and R9  
> and ping between them with no joy.
>
> When I come to debug I see weird label values in the FIB:
>
> Rack1R1#sh ip cef vrf VPN_A 10.44.9.9 det
> 10.44.9.9/32, epoch 0
>  recursive via 44.44.44.9 label 31
>    nexthop 150.1.101.254 ATM3/0.1 label 65569
>
> Rack1R9#sh ip cef vrf VPN_A 100.100.100.1 det
> 100.100.100.1/32, epoch 0
>  recursive via 44.44.44.1 label 31
>    nexthop 150.1.109.254 ATM3/0.1 label 65569
>
> Do they actually mean anything?
>
> Looking at the packets, you do not see the ATM VC in the label value  
> in the packet header (because there is no mechanism to put the  
> values in there), therefore you can not see if there is a problem  
> there:
>
> (ATM1)
> 19:44:06: MPLS turbo: AT3/0.1: rx: Len 112 Stack {0 0 255} {31 0  
> 255} - ipv4 data
> 19:44:06: MPLS turbo: AT1/0.1: tx: Len 112 Stack {0 0 254} {31 0  
> 255} - ipv4 data
>
> On the other end, I see the MPLS packet come in (again with a  
> zero'ed label) but then I do not see the IP packet materialise in a  
> 'debug ip packet'...
>
> (R1)
> 19:45:39: MPLS turbo: AT3/0.1: rx: Len 112 Stack {0 0 254} {31 0  
> 255} - ipv4 data
>
> Normally in a frame-mode environment I would be able to trace the  
> label stacking and look at the stack change as the packets flow  
> through the network. I can't really do that here, other than see  
> that the VPN label does appear to remain. It looks like cell-mode  
> devices do not perform PHP?
>
> debug mpls atm-ldp X does not really produce anything helpful.
>
> It's almost like the routers are receiving the labelled packets (w/ 
> stack) over the ATM interfaces and the not doing anything further  
> with them. However a single label on the packet is okay.
>
> Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this further...
>
>
> (Oh, and congrats Brian Bartik).
>
>
> --
> Dan Holme
>
>
>
>
> This email has been scanned for all viruses.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> The content of this email and any attachment is private and may be  
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,  
> disclosure, copying or forwarding of this email and/or its  
> attachments is unauthorised. If you have received this email in  
> error please notify the sender by email and delete this message and  
> any attachments immediately. Nothing in this email shall bind the  
> Company or any of its subsidiaries or businesses in any contract or  
> obligation, unless we have specifically agreed to be bound.
>
> KCOM Group PLC is a public limited company incorporated in England  
> and Wales, company number 02150618 and whose registered office is at  
> 37 Carr Lane, Hull, HU1 3RE.
>
> 118288 - KCOM UK Directory Enquiries. Calls will cost no more than  
> 49p connection + 14p per minute including VAT from a KC or BT  
> landline. Call charges from mobiles and other networks may vary. If  
> you are calling from a mobile you will now receive your requested  
> number via text message. You will not be charged for the text message.
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to