If thats the case I don't see how you can do it. For that scenario I may elect not to use VRF select and instead do sort of a VRF Lite configuration with a dot1q trunk between the CE and PE router. On the PE you could have different subinterfaces in different VRFs and operate routing protocols normally.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Jose Zamora <[email protected]> wrote: > Not is possible to do that, cause the source only can match unicast > address. > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:36 AM, matt reath <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Could you possibly associate the multicast address that OSPF or RIPv2 uses >> with a particular VRF? >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Jose Zamora <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The quiestion is when you are using VRF SELECT, in this case the >>> interface is not associated with any vrf in specific, depends in the source >>> of the packet the association with a VRF . >>> I tried to use OSPF, RIP and BGP and the solution didnt work, only usig >>> static routes. >>> >>> Jose >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM, chico ahmad <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> well Jose i dont know whethr this is what u meant but if u wanna have >>>> routing between PE and CE where u have a vrf all u need to do is configure >>>> an address-family ipv4 and under it you can configure any routing protocol >>>> u >>>> wanna use between u(PE) and the CE >>>> >>>> ahmad >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Atentamente Jose Zamora Prado >>> Telefono 8252885 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >>> visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Atentamente Jose Zamora Prado > Telefono 8252885 >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
