> Hi
> 
> On this task we have to configure 2 Loopbacks and advertise a summary
> of them via ISIS.
> Why not just configure the summary address, the solution says a
> redistribute connected with a route map and the summary address is the
> right way.
> 
> I have tried both ways and it seems that there is no difference
> between them.
> 
> R9(config-router)#do sh run | be ^router isis
> router isis 1
>  net 49.0009.9999.9999.9999.00
>  metric-style wide
>  summary-address 10.6.0.0 255.255.254.0 level-1-2
>  redistribute static ip
>  passive-interface Loopback0
>  passive-interface Loopback1
>  passive-interface Loopback2
> 
> R2#sh ip route isis
>      200.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 5 subnets
> i L2    200.0.0.9 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> i L1    200.0.0.4 [115/10] via 150.50.24.1, Serial0/1.24
> i L1    200.0.0.5 [115/10] via 150.50.25.1, Serial0/1.25
> i L2    200.0.0.6 [115/10] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> i L2 192.6.6.0/24 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
>      10.0.0.0/23 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> i L2    10.6.0.0 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> i L2 192.7.7.0/24 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
>      150.50.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 8 subnets, 3 masks
> i L1    150.50.56.0/24 [115/10] via 150.50.25.1, Serial0/1.25
> i L2    150.50.69.0/30 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> i L2    150.50.69.2/32 [115/30] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> i L2    150.50.86.0/24 [115/20] via 150.50.26.1, Serial0/1.26
> R2#
> R2#
> R2#ping 10.6.1.6   
> 
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.6.1.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 36/44/52
> ms
> R2#ping 10.6.0.6
> 
> Type escape sequence to abort.
> Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.6.0.6, timeout is 2 seconds:
> !!!!!
> Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/92/300
> ms
> R2#
> 
> 
> Best regards
> peter
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to