Lower and it didn't have and effect. I made the RD of the other route higher and this also didn't work.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>wrote: > This is slowly but surely beginning to annoy me :-). > > When you changed the RD just before, did you change it to be > numerically higher or lower than the other one? > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:29, karim okasha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Marko, > > > > VRF configuration on R8: > > ! > > ip vrf sp1000 > > rd 1000:8 > > route-target export 1000:1000 > > route-target import 1000:1000 > > ! > > > > VRF Configuration on R2: > > ! > > ip vrf sp1000 > > rd 1000:2 > > route-target export 1000:1000 > > route-target import 1000:1000 > > ! > > > > VRF configuration on R3: > > > > ! > > ip vrf sp1000 > > rd 1000:3 > > route-target export 1000:1000 > > route-target import 1000:1000 > > ! > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:22, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Can you post the output of the "sp1000" RF definition, with all import > >> > and export statements on R8, please? > >> > >> VRF definition :-) > > > > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
