I will do this lab in the next couple of days and i will share with you my 
findings.
 

Regards,

Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
[email protected]


 

  _____  

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rin
Sent: segunda-feira, 22 de Junho de 2009 10:07
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_SP] VOL2 - Section 2



Hi all, 

 

I've just finished Vol 2 - Lab 2. Here's some of my comments:  

Task 3.2: The task requires R5 to be the primary exit point for AS100 & R2 
should use its own link to R6. The solution applying
route-map inbound on interface connected to R6 of R2 & R5. However, by doing 
this R2 will use R5 as the exit point as well. My
solution is applying route-map outbound on frame-relay inteface of R2 & R5. 
Although local-preference should be normally applied
inbound but in this case it works. Here's the config & result:

R2:

router bgp 100 

 address-family ipv4

 neighbor AS100 route-map SET_LOCAL_PREF out 

!

route-map SET_LOCAL_PREF permit 10

 set local-preference 25

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

R5:

router bgp 100 

 address-family ipv4

 neighbor AS100 route-map SET_LOCAL_PREF out 

!

route-map SET_LOCAL_PREF permit 10

 set local-preference 50

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

R2#sho ip bgp 

BGP table version is 21, local router ID is 100.100.100.2

Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,

              r RIB-failure, S Stale

Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

 

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

r>i100.100.100.1/32 100.100.100.1            0    100      0 i

*> 100.100.100.2/32 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i

r>i100.100.100.4/32 100.100.100.4            0    100      0 i

r>i100.100.100.5/32 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 i

* i200.200.200.0    100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

*>                  100.200.26.6             0             0 200 i

* i200.200.200.6/32 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

*>                  100.200.26.6             0             0 200 i

* i200.200.200.7/32 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

*>                  100.200.26.6                           0 200 i

* i200.200.200.8/32 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

*>                  100.200.26.6                           0 200 i

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

R1#sho ip bgp 

BGP table version is 13, local router ID is 100.100.100.1

Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,

              r RIB-failure, S Stale

Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete

 

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

*> 100.100.100.1/32 0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i

r>i100.100.100.2/32 100.100.100.2            0     25      0 i

r>i100.100.100.5/32 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 i

* i200.200.200.0    100.100.100.2            0     25      0 200 i

*>i                 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

* i200.200.200.6/32 100.100.100.2            0     25      0 200 i

*>i                 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

* i200.200.200.7/32 100.100.100.2            0     25      0 200 i

*>i                 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

* i200.200.200.8/32 100.100.100.2            0     25      0 200 i

*>i                 100.100.100.5            0     50      0 200 i

 

Task 3.4: To make R6 prefers that path to R2, I also can change the Weight 
attribute on R6 or setting MED attribute on R6. Anyone
see any problem of these 2 methods? 

 

Task 6.7: We have to use Site-of-origin to prevent EIGRP routing loop in VPNC. 
The solution does not mention. 

 

Task 6.8: The solution use send-label command. However, we do not need to 
configure send-label under BGP. This is Inter-AS VPN
Option 2a. 

 

Task 8.2:  I got a weird behavior with this task: After configuring classifying 
ICMP traffic on R1 & R4. Ping 5 packets from R9 to
R3 but R4 can only match 3 packets & mark with CS3. Anyone has the same 
problem? Here is the config & output:

R1:

ip access-list extended ICMP

 permit icmp any any echo

!

class-map match-all ICMP

  match access-group name ICMP

!

policy-map MARK

  class ICMP

   set ip dscp cs3

!

interface FastEthernet0/0.149

  service-policy input MARK

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

R9#ping 3.3.3.3

 

Type escape sequence to abort.

Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 3.3.3.3, timeout is 2 seconds:

!!!!!

Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 184/221/272 ms

R9#

01:21:55: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 3.3.3.3, dst 14.0.109.9

01:21:55: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 3.3.3.3, dst 14.0.109.9

01:21:56: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 3.3.3.3, dst 14.0.109.9

01:21:56: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 3.3.3.3, dst 14.0.109.9

01:21:56: ICMP: echo reply rcvd, src 3.3.3.3, dst 14.0.109.9

R9#

TermServ#1

[Resuming connection 1 to r1 ... ]

 

01:24:21: MPLS turbo: Se4/0: rx: Len 108 Stack {105 3 252} - ipv4 data

01:24:21: MPLS turbo: Se4/0: rx: Len 108 Stack {105 0 252} - ipv4 data

01:24:22: MPLS turbo: Se4/0: rx: Len 108 Stack {105 3 252} - ipv4 data

01:24:22: MPLS turbo: Se4/0: rx: Len 108 Stack {105 0 252} - ipv4 data

01:24:22: MPLS turbo: Se4/0: rx: Len 108 Stack {105 3 252} - ipv4 data

 

Task 8.4: By appling ACL outbound on R6, we cannot filter traffic with RFC1918 
source that was originated from R6. Anyone has other
solution? 

 

Please give your comments. Thanks. 

Rin

 

 

Reply via email to