And, most importantly, you're less likely to lose track or get confused.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:00 AM, <[email protected]>wrote: > Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. single router Id and multiple IGPs (max kamali) > 2. Re: single router Id and multiple IGPs (Bob McCouch) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 17:11:08 -0700 > From: max kamali <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] single router Id and multiple IGPs > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Howdy All, > > Are there any down-sides to using the same router ID (sourced from a > loopback interface) for both OSPF and EIGRP and have both protocols > advertize them as their own, in the same router? also, are there any > hidden land mines if you are mutually redistributing both IGPs in this > scenario? > > I have been experimenting with this scenario and I can't seem to find > any issues in this scenario in a lab environment with 3 routers. > > (eigrp rtr)---------(eigrp/ospf rtr)-----------(ospf rtr) > > > Thanks > Max > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 20:17:04 -0400 > From: Bob McCouch <[email protected]> > To: max kamali <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] single router Id and multiple IGPs > Message-ID: <-7166774375651145109@unknownmsgid> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > It is actually required to have matching RIDs for redistributing > between OSPF and BGP, IIRC. > > No downsides that I know of. Each IGP works independently and is > unaware of what RID another is using even during redistribution. > > Bob > -- > Sent from my iPhone, please excuse any typos. > > On May 20, 2013, at 8:14 PM, max kamali <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Howdy All, > > > > Are there any down-sides to using the same router ID (sourced from a > loopback interface) for both OSPF and EIGRP and have both protocols > advertize them as their own, in the same router? also, are there any hidden > land mines if you are mutually redistributing both IGPs in this scenario? > > > > I have been experimenting with this scenario and I can't seem to find > any issues in this scenario in a lab environment with 3 routers. > > > > (eigrp rtr)---------(eigrp/ospf rtr)-----------(ospf rtr) > > > > > > Thanks > > Max > > _______________________________________________ > > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > > End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 88, Issue 16 > *************************************** > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
