why most people fail CCIE lab at first attempt. i beleive the high rate of failure is intentional to boast the source of income.------------------------------ On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 3:49 PM PDT [email protected] wrote: >Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: VTP weirdness (Marko Milivojevic) > 2. Re: V1 task 9.22 redistribution (Marko Milivojevic) > 3. Re: VTP weirdness (Lukasz) > 4. Re: VTP weirdness (marc abel) > 5. Re: VTP weirdness (Lukasz) > 6. Re: VTP weirdness (Marko Milivojevic) > 7. Re: V1 task 9.22 redistribution (Tony Singh) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:12:37 -0700 >From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >To: George Leslie <[email protected]> >Cc: IPExpert Study List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VTP weirdness >Message-ID: > <cagdym0wkqqwex1shrp5oonb-ng8v93busdgyhpth-q94qy7...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >MD5 mismatch refers to the fact that databases from two (or more) >servers have the same revision, but not the same content/checksum. >That way, neither one can override the other. It's not an >authentication issue. > >-- >Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > >On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:49 AM, George Leslie ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am almost embarrassed to post this, but in the spirit of ?the >> only stupid question, is the one you don?t ask?.?, here is what I did in a lab: >> >> >> >> SW1 >> >> Hostname Switch1 >> >> Vtp mode server >> >> Vtp domain ipexpert >> >> Vtp password ipexpert >> >> Vtp version 2 >> >> Exit >> >> Vlan 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 >> >> Exit >> >> End >> >> Wr >> >> >> >> ON SW2 ? SW4 >> >> Hostname Switch[2-4] >> >> Vtp mode client >> >> Vtp domain ipexpert >> >> Vtp password ipexpert >> >> Vtp version 2 >> >> exit >> >> ON ALL 4 SWITCHES >> >> Default int fast0/19 >> >> Default int fast0/20 >> >> Default int fast0/21 >> >> Default int fast0/22 >> >> Default int fast0/23 >> >> Default int fast0/24 >> >> Int r f0/19 ? 24 >> >> Shut >> >> Sw tru en dot >> >> Sw mo tru >> >> Sw non >> >> No shut >> >> >> >> All trunks came up (sho int trunk), sh vtp pass on all >> switches showed correct password (and they were all pasted in from the same >> line on notepad), show vtp status showed all info you?d expect, but SW2 ? SW4 >> showed an ?MD5 error? on all trunks. >> >> Vlans were not propagated from SW1. I bounced trunks, I converted to transparent >> mode and back to client or server as appropriate.I changed domains to a dummy >> value then back again. Nothing made any >> difference. >> >> Eventually, I reload all four switches, and that fixed it. >> >> My question is: what exactly causes this MD5 error, other >> than the passwords being different? Is >> there anything I missed? George >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:13:18 -0700 >From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >To: Tony Singh <[email protected]> >Cc: CC IE <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] V1 task 9.22 redistribution >Message-ID: > <cagdym0xwznqm3gzaqz_snetrt6a6yw325m7hzc25crpddrv...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >What did the video solution say? > >-- >Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert > >On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> Can anyone help on this please >> >> -- >> BR >> >> Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> >> On 26 Oct 2012, at 03:07, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> in this task it asks that AS 6009 is preferred after all is said and done, ok so we have a better seed metric on r6 for this for both eigrp processes. >>> >>> now im getting confused on "where" exactly AS6009 should show up as being preferred? >>> >>> thanks in advance >>> >>> Tony >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:23:26 +0100 >From: Lukasz <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VTP weirdness >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > >hm...does that mean that the order of commands matter? > >Should we not put the vtp version 2 command as the first command on all >switches? Default is version1. > > >Lukasz > >On 2012-10-26 18:12, Marko Milivojevic wrote: >> MD5 mismatch refers to the fact that databases from two (or more) >> servers have the same revision, but not the same content/checksum. >> That way, neither one can override the other. It's not an >> authentication issue. >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:49 AM, George Leslie >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am almost embarrassed to post this, but in the spirit of ?the >>> only stupid question, is the one you don?t ask?.?, here is what I >>> did in a lab: >>> >>> >>> >>> SW1 >>> >>> Hostname Switch1 >>> >>> Vtp mode server >>> >>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>> >>> Vtp password ipexpert >>> >>> Vtp version 2 >>> >>> Exit >>> >>> Vlan 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 >>> >>> Exit >>> >>> End >>> >>> Wr >>> >>> >>> >>> ON SW2 ? SW4 >>> >>> Hostname Switch[2-4] >>> >>> Vtp mode client >>> >>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>> >>> Vtp password ipexpert >>> >>> Vtp version 2 >>> >>> exit >>> >>> ON ALL 4 SWITCHES >>> >>> Default int fast0/19 >>> >>> Default int fast0/20 >>> >>> Default int fast0/21 >>> >>> Default int fast0/22 >>> >>> Default int fast0/23 >>> >>> Default int fast0/24 >>> >>> Int r f0/19 ? 24 >>> >>> >>> Shut >>> >>> Sw tru en dot >>> >>> Sw mo tru >>> >>> Sw non >>> >>> >>> No shut >>> >>> >>> >>> All trunks came up (sho int trunk), sh vtp >>> pass on all >>> switches showed correct password (and they were all pasted >>> in from >>> the same >>> line on notepad), show vtp status showed all >>> info you?d expect, but >>> SW2 ? SW4 >>> showed an ?MD5 error? on all >>> trunks. >>> >>> Vlans were not propagated from SW1. I bounced trunks, I >>> converted >>> to transparent >>> mode and back to client or server as >>> appropriate.I changed domains >>> to a dummy >>> value then back again. >>> Nothing made any >>> difference. >>> >>> Eventually, I reload all four >>> switches, and that fixed it. >>> >>> My question is: what exactly causes >>> this MD5 error, other >>> than the passwords being different? Is >>> there >>> anything I missed? George >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:27:35 -0500 >From: marc abel <[email protected]> >To: Lukasz <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VTP weirdness >Message-ID: > <canyr4znaqvyno7ueexjpzrxzjydu3tpbx7fkq96lhejwujd...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > >No it means you need to bump the revision number on your server by either >creating a vlan or deleting a vlan. Basically if we both have config >revision 1 then I can't update you. If I create a vlan I will have revision >2 which will overwrite your revision 1 and then we will be synced. > >On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Lukasz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> hm...does that mean that the order of commands matter? >> >> Should we not put the vtp version 2 command as the first command on all >> switches? Default is version1. >> >> >> Lukasz >> >> >> On 2012-10-26 18:12, Marko Milivojevic wrote: >> >>> MD5 mismatch refers to the fact that databases from two (or more) >>> servers have the same revision, but not the same content/checksum. >>> That way, neither one can override the other. It's not an >>> authentication issue. >>> >>> -- >>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:49 AM, George Leslie >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I am almost embarrassed to post this, but in the spirit of ?the >>>> only stupid question, is the one you don?t ask?.?, here is what I did in >>>> a lab: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> SW1 >>>> >>>> Hostname Switch1 >>>> >>>> Vtp mode server >>>> >>>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>>> >>>> Vtp password ipexpert >>>> >>>> Vtp version 2 >>>> >>>> Exit >>>> >>>> Vlan 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 >>>> >>>> Exit >>>> >>>> End >>>> >>>> Wr >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ON SW2 ? SW4 >>>> >>>> Hostname Switch[2-4] >>>> >>>> Vtp mode client >>>> >>>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>>> >>>> Vtp password ipexpert >>>> >>>> Vtp version 2 >>>> >>>> exit >>>> >>>> ON ALL 4 SWITCHES >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/19 >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/20 >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/21 >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/22 >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/23 >>>> >>>> Default int fast0/24 >>>> >>>> Int r f0/19 ? 24 >>>> >>>> Shut >>>> >>>> Sw tru en dot >>>> >>>> Sw mo tru >>>> >>>> Sw non >>>> >>>> No shut >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> All trunks came up (sho int trunk), sh vtp pass on all >>>> switches showed correct password (and they were all pasted in from the >>>> same >>>> line on notepad), show vtp status showed all info you?d expect, but SW2 >>>> ? SW4 >>>> showed an ?MD5 error? on all trunks. >>>> >>>> Vlans were not propagated from SW1. I bounced trunks, I converted to >>>> transparent >>>> mode and back to client or server as appropriate.I changed domains to a >>>> dummy >>>> value then back again. Nothing made any >>>> difference. >>>> >>>> Eventually, I reload all four switches, and that fixed it. >>>> >>>> My question is: what exactly causes this MD5 error, other >>>> than the passwords being different? Is >>>> there anything I missed? George >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/**mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs<http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs> >>>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/**mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs<http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs> >>> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> >> http://onlinestudylist.com/**mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs<http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs> >> > > > >-- >Marc Abel >CCIE #35470 >(Routing and Switching) > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:35:21 +0100 >From: Lukasz <[email protected]> >To: marc abel <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VTP weirdness >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > >Thanks, understand now :) > > > >On 2012-10-26 22:27, marc abel wrote: >> No it means you need to bump the revision number on your server by >> either creating a vlan or deleting a vlan. Basically if we both have >> config revision 1 then I can't update you. If I create a vlan I will >> have revision 2 which will overwrite your?revision?1 and then we >> will be synced. >> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Lukasz <[email protected] [11]> >> wrote: >> >>> hm...does that mean that the order of commands matter? >>> >> >>> Should we not put the vtp version 2 command as the first command on >>> >> all switches? Default is version1. >>> >>> Lukasz >>> >>> On 2012-10-26 >> 18:12, Marko Milivojevic wrote: >>> >>>> MD5 mismatch refers to the fact >> that databases from two (or more) >>>> servers have the same revision, but >> not the same >>>> content/checksum. >>>> That way, neither one can override >> the other. It's not an >>>> authentication issue. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marko >> Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >>>> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:49 AM, George Leslie >>>> >> <[email protected] [4]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I >> am almost embarrassed to post this, but in the spirit of >>>>> ?the >>>>> >> only stupid question, is the one you don?t ask?.?, here >>>>> is what I did >> in a lab: >>>>> >>>>> SW1 >>>>> >>>>> Hostname Switch1 >>>>> >>>>> Vtp mode >> server >>>>> >>>>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>>>> >>>>> Vtp password ipexpert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vtp version 2 >>>>> >>>>> Exit >>>>> >>>>> Vlan 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Exit >>>>> >>>>> End >>>>> >>>>> Wr >>>>> >>>>> ON SW2 >>>>> >>>>> ? SW4 >>>>> >>>>> Hostname Switch[2-4] >>>>> >>>>> Vtp mode client >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vtp domain ipexpert >>>>> >>>>> Vtp password ipexpert >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vtp version 2 >>>>> >>>>> exit >>>>> >>>>> ON ALL 4 >>>>> >>>>> SWITCHES >>>>> >>>>> Default int fast0/19 >>>>> >>>>> Default int >>>>> >>>>> fast0/20 >>>>> >>>>> Default int fast0/21 >>>>> >>>>> Default int >>>>> >>>>> fast0/22 >>>>> >>>>> Default int fast0/23 >>>>> >>>>> Default int >>>>> >>>>> fast0/24 >>>>> >>>>> Int r f0/19 ? 24 >>>>> >>>>> Shut >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sw tru en dot >>>>> >>>>> Sw mo tru >>>>> >>>>> Sw non >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No shut >>>>> >>>>> All trunks came up (sho int trunk), sh vtp >>>>> >>>>> pass on all >>>>> switches showed correct password (and they were >>>>> >>>>> all pasted in >>>>> from the same >>>>> line on notepad), show vtp >>>>> >>>>> status showed all info you?d >>>>> expect, but SW2 ? SW4 >>>>> showed an ?MD5 error? on all trunks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vlans were not propagated from SW1. ?I bounced trunks, I >>>>> >>>>> converted to transparent >>>>> mode and back to client or server as >>>>> appropriate.I changed >>>>> domains to a dummy >>>>> value then back >>>>> again. ?Nothing made any >>>>> difference. >>>>> >>>>> Eventually, I >>>>> reload all four switches, and that fixed it. >>>>> >>>>> My question is: >>>>> what exactly causes this MD5 error, other >>>>> than the passwords being >>>>> different? ?Is >>>>> there anything I missed? ?George >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> For more >>>>> information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>>> training, please >>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com [1] >>>>> >>>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and >>>>> looking for a job? Check out >>>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com [2] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs [3] >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab >>>> training, >>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com [5] >>>> >>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com [6] >>>> >>>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs [7] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com [8] >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com [9] >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs [10] >> >> -- >> Marc Abel >> CCIE #35470 >> (Routing and Switching) >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] http://www.ipexpert.com >> [2] http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> [3] http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> [4] mailto:[email protected] >> [5] http://www.ipexpert.com >> [6] http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> [7] http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> [8] http://www.ipexpert.com >> [9] http://www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> [10] http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> [11] mailto:[email protected] > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:40:37 -0700 >From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >To: marc abel <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] VTP weirdness >Message-ID: > <cagdym0ypvlfxwfzuygqgqeeeex6vcicxfjcabocwwlvw6fp...@mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:27 PM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote: >> No it means you need to bump the revision number on your server by either >> creating a vlan or deleting a vlan. Basically if we both have config >> revision 1 then I can't update you. If I create a vlan I will have revision >> 2 which will overwrite your revision 1 and then we will be synced. > >Correct. > >-- >Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >Senior CCIE >Instructor - IPexpert > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >>Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:49:05 +0100 >From: Tony Singh ><[email protected]> >To: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> >Cc: CC >IE <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] V1 task 9.22 >redistribution >Message-ID: > ><CAL=vy7dzhhdmt6womjofu5esphu9jrpvhlrrepuygdo0pqf...@mail.gmail.com> >>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > >It says that AS6009 should >be preferred, so > >r6 >router eigrp 1001 >redistribute eigrp 6009 > >default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 > >router eigrp 6009 > redistribute >eigrp 1001 > default-metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 > >so routes from r6's >perspective from other connected As's see the route >from 6009, is that it? > >>example of r1's loopback > >R6#show ip route 200.0.0.1 >Routing entry for >200.0.0.1/32 > Known via "eigrp 1001", distance 170, metric 41794560, type external > Redistributing via eigrp 1001, eigrp 6009 > *Advertised by eigrp 6009* > Last update from 150.100.100.2 on Serial0/1/0, 00:18:52 ago > Routing Descriptor Blocks: > * 150.100.100.2, from 150.100.100.2, 00:18:52 ago, via Serial0/1/0 > Route metric is 41794560, traffic share count is 1 > Total delay is 70100 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 64 Kbit > Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes > Loading 1/255, Hops 2 > > >what about from other routers perspective? checked and they obv see best >networks from their own AS > >this is expected i guess as they know not of other AS's tho those AS routes >have been redistributed into their own AS1001 - but not 100% clear in DSG & >video > >Sorry for being a thicko Marko but I don't see it as black and white! > >BR > >Tony > > > >On 26 October 2012 18:13, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What did the video solution say? >> >> -- >> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 (SP R&S) >> Senior CCIE Instructor - IPexpert >> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Can anyone help on this please >> > >> > -- >> > BR >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone on 3 >> > >> > On 26 Oct 2012, at 03:07, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> in this task it asks that AS 6009 is preferred after all is said and >> done, ok so we have a better seed metric on r6 for this for both eigrp >> processes. >> >> >> >> now im getting confused on "where" exactly AS6009 should show up as >> being preferred? >> >> >> >> thanks in advance >> >> >> >> Tony >> > _______________________________________________ >> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >> please visit www.ipexpert.com >> > >> > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >> > >> > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >> > > >End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 81, Issue 63 >*************************************** _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
