team have i broken any rules here as comparing to the detailed solution guide for task 7.3 iv used p2p dlci's from r2 to r5 & r2 to r6 for bridge group 1 to maintain 150.100.100.x & 150.100.221.x reachability
for task 7.4 reachability from bb1 to bb3 iv used another p2p dlci from r2 to r6 for bridge group 2 & bvi's on r1,r2,r6 & r9 in subnet 100.100.100.x (Joe has subnetted out the 150.100.100.0/24 out which iv kept in tact for bridge group 1) reading over the questions it doesn't restrict usage to 2 dlci's on r2 (iv used 3) or even creating additional bvi's in subnet 100.100.100.x for bridge group 2 (this is for reachability bb1 to bb3) your help is appreciated! On 13 October 2012 16:26, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > Joe seems to have reachability without the bvi's configured according to > the DSG (although looking at the video 30 mins this showed he had non > learning mac address issues, he fixed with re-adding vlan config to access > ports, though im already learning the mac's ok on "bridge 2 verbose" but > not receiving constant frames and they time out) > > **calls Marko... > > > > On 13 October 2012 16:06, Saleh Batouq <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes creating the Bvi interface is the fix. Otherwise use bridge crb >> insread >> On Oct 13, 2012 6:46 PM, "Tony Singh" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> One way iv got this to work is by creating a BVI2 instance +bridge irb >>> in >>> the same 100.100.100.x subnet on each r1/r2/r6/r9 >>> >>> Would this satisfy the requirement? >>> >>> Seems by merely bridging from r1 to r9 bb1 & bb3 can't talk, the config >>> below was the same as Joe's detailed solution guide >>> >>> >>> >>> On 13 October 2012 14:36, Tony Singh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > This is from V1 lab 7.4 >>> > >>> > *Topology* >>> >>> > BB1 > VLAN100 > R1 VLAN12 > R2 > FR P2P > R6 bridged to R9 > VLAN300 > >>> BB3 >>> > >>> > Goal is to ping from BB1 100.100.100.100/24 to BB3 100.100.100.250/24 >>> > >>> > I can see arp on R1 & R9 for both BB1 & BB3 f0/0 interfaces but I cant >>> get >>> > ping to run from either end... >>> > >>> > Because this task bridges 3 vlan domains iv checked the relevant >>> > switchport configs are ok hence would not be getting the mac addresses >>> for >>> > each end of the bb's on r1/r9 (although they do time out a bit) >>> > >>> > Debug shows the ar coming in at either r1 r r9 ends >>> > >>> > r1 >>> > *Oct 13 10:17:59.847: IP ARP: rcvd req src 100.100.100.100 >>> 000d.bd31.0460, >>> > dst 100.100.100.250 FastEthernet0/1 >>> > >>> > r9 >>> > *Oct 13 12:41:07.002: IP ARP: rcvd req src 100.100.100.250 >>> 000f.8fdd.5740, >>> > dst 100.100.100.100 FastEthernet0/0 >>> > >>> > Spanning tree bridge instance 2 is running and agree on R6 as root.... >>> > >>> > configs below >>> > >>> > r1 >>> > bridge irb >>> > bridge 2 protocol ieee >>> > bridge 2 route ip >>> > int f0/0 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > int f0/1 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > >>> > >>> > r2 >>> > bridge 2 protocol ieee >>> > int f0/0 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > int s0/2/1.206 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > >>> > r6 >>> > bridge 2 protocol ieee >>> > int s0/1/0.602 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > int s0/2/0 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > >>> > r9 >>> > bridge irb >>> > bridge 2 protocol ieee >>> > bridge 2 route ip >>> > int s0/2/0 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > int f0/0 >>> > bridge-group 2 >>> > >>> > >>> > can you see what's wrong? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, >>> please visit www.ipexpert.com >>> >>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out >>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com >>> >>> http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs >>> >> > _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
