HI Zak,Your config as it stands would not work, I believe. You have used a standard access list, 10, which only matches on source IP address. The multicast packets would have the multicast addresses in the destination field, so you'd need an extended access list. Regards, George. > Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 18:40:22 +0300 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Volume 1 - Lab 23 - Section 8 > > Hello guys, > > Is it valid to use policing for section 8 of Lab 23 in volume 1 workbook? > > > Question: > > On R1 limit IP multicast traffic destined to groups 226.0.0.1 through > 226.0.0.126 inbound on interface Fa0/0 to 512Kbps. > > > > > I have used the below config. > > ! > class-map match-all multicast > match access-group 10 > ! > policy-map multicast > class multicast > police 512000 > ! > interface FastEthernet0/0 > service-policy input multicast > ! > access-list 10 deny 226.0.0.127 > access-list 10 deny 226.0.0.0 > access-list 10 permit 226.0.0.0 0.0.0.127 > ! > ! > > > > > regards, > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out > www.PlatinumPlacement.com > > http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
