Hi,
I am doing a redistribution lab. There's a router R2 running RIP, OSPF and
EIGRP100, with redist OSPF-to-RIP and redist RIP-to-EIGRP100. R2 interface
Fa0/0.23 (10.1.23.0/24) is participating on RIP and OSPF.
R4 is running EIGRP100 and form adjancency with R2. And when i run show ip
route eigrp 100 on R4, i am seeing the route 10.1.23.0/24 as "D EX" route
indicating that this route was redistributed from RIP.
The question is, why 10.1.23.0/24 was part of RIP routes? I was under
impression that if RIP and OSPF co-exist, OSPF should win the right (better
metric than RIP) to install the 10.1.23.0/24 route onto the routing table, and
routing table will cease the RIP route. Yet, when on R4 routing table, the
10.1.23.0/24 is still exist on RIP table.
Thanks in advance for the assistance.
Brgds
Benny
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
