Hi Guys,

I know that wild-card mask is inverted of subnet mask but I just met with a
friend that told me it isn't necessary work like that, so I drop this
question and probably someone can tell me why it isn't. well, thanks Rob for
the answer.

On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hello Rob,
>
> I will agree with you in that the wild card mask is not necessarily the
> inverse of a subnet mask, but if had something to compare it to an inverse
> mask is the closest thing that I could think of.
>
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:50:32 -0700
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] offset-list and wild card mask
>
> >
> >
> >
> > I would disagree and say that a wildcard mask isn't the inverse of a
> subnet mask
> > in IOS. A subnet mask will always have consecutive ones and zeros. A
> wildcard
> > mask doesn't have that same requirement in IOS. However, if you're
> working in
> > NX-OS, I'd say that you could make that correlation, becuase it doesn't
> allow
> > any 0s in the wildcard mask after the first 1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Uli <[email protected]>
> > To: "<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 11:04:04 AM
> > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] offset-list and wild card mask
> >
> > Hi Expert,
> >
> > Does anyone can explain to me about offset-list as I kind of confused
> with
> > it. also, in my opinion that wild card mask is reverse of subnet mask,
> but
> > someone told me it isn't ?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit
> > www.ipexpert.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to