>But I have more experience in enterprise-like network designs.

Completely opposite for me. I've been in the SP world for 10+ years, and
I fortunately have access to gear that runs XR, XE, NX. I can see this being
a problem soon for folks on the new SP track though. Will be interesting to
see how the Certification community deals with the changes (hopefully Cisco
will provide some help). I can attest, the gear is beyond expensive, so a
EMU is almost gonna be a must. Guess I have no excuses for not going SP
track when I finally pass the R&S  :)

Max



On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM, BNM <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Smail,
>
> I somehow agree with you. Im pretty much in the same dilemma - well used
> to...
> R&S has quite a good representation and given the fact that 4.0 covers
> MPLS,
> I actually think its worth the effort.
> In my opinion if you have CCNP, CCDP and other enterprise certs and
> experience, 'digging deeper' into it shud be interesting. I have strong
> interest in SP too.
> But I have more experience in enterprise-like network designs.
> So I need a smooth transition into CCIEville before I can harness
> everything
> else it can offer.
> Tyson and team seem to have everything for everyone though!! :P
>
> At the end of the day, it just depend on your interest and passion.
>
> All the best. Please comment guys, I want this number too!!
>
> On 21 February 2011 05:43, Smail Milak <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I checked the SP blueprint a few times and I think that it will be pretty
> > hard to study some topics like Packet over SONET, 10GE and VPLS without
> the
> > hardware, Plus it is not known to me when IPX will update their books.
> >
> > Is it smart to change to R/S? I have already the IPX SP books. Until now
> I
> > covered only the IGPs, BGP, Multicast and MPLS TE.
> > In the last three months I have not learned for CCIE SP because I had to
> > learn for some other certs (CCNA Sec, CCDA and CCDP). In 1-2 Months I
> will
> > hopefuly have my CCDP.
> >
> > I took a look at the R/S blueprint. It looks interesting and I think that
> I
> > will rather encounter the R/S topics than the SP ones in my job.
> >
> > These are my arguments for a change to R/S:
> >
> > - No High-end hardware needed
> > - Bigger online community
> > - Topics are more real world than the SP topics (in my job)
> > - Cisco 360 Learning program (I dont know if the IPX courses are better,
> or
> > cheaper)
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------
> "Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part."
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to