Now that's a good question. Not that this will happen but what if a later task 
has you remove the multilink bundle? In this way you still satisfy the 
requirements since it configured on tfhe physicals. In my eyes this just a 
precautionary measure, however I think you are ok and would have received your 
points

Jason Maynard <[email protected]> wrote:



Another quick observation and question

I had the configuration only on the Multilink69 interface while the DSG had it 
on Multilink 69, Serial 0/2/0 and Serial 0/2/1 interfaces.

I tested mine by just shutting down one of the interface and bringing it back 
up and "debug ppp authentication" showed the interface authenticating.

Is the configuration required on the physicals as well?



On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Di Bias, Steve 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think they just mean more secure than PAP, so CHAP or EAP would both satisfy 
the requirements

Jason Maynard <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


VOL3_Lab2_Section 1.4



PPP should be authenticated using a more secure method and a password
"ipexpert"



The DSG showed the solution using CHAP I used EAP.



Did I miss something?





#######################

Example from R6 (My Config)

#######################

aaa new-model

aaa authentication login default none

aaa authentication ppp EAP local



username R9 password 0 ipexpert



interface Multilink69

ip address 166.6.9.6 255.255.255.224

no peer neighbor-route

encapsulation ppp

ppp authentication eap EAP

ppp eap password 0 ipexpert

ppp eap local

end



#########################

Example from R6 (DSG IPExpert)

#########################

username R9 password 0 ipexpert



interface Multilink69

ip address 166.6.9.6 255.255.255.224

no peer neighbor-route

 encapsulation ppp

ppp authentication chap

ppp chap password 0 ipexpert

end









_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com<http://www.ipexpert.com>


UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this was sent to you in 
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 
original message.



UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this was sent to you in 
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 
original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to