Netman,

I have this product as well, what was the time at which he mentioned this
trap?

was he talking about just a normal link up / link down trap?

i am going to listen to it again and see if i can hear when he says, because
i looked in the 3560 config guide and do not see anything other than this
reference to traps in the etherchannel section and i didnt see it in the
'traps' section for PAGP or LACP:

"If a link within an EtherChannel fails, traffic previously carried over
that failed link moves to the remaining links within the EtherChannel. If
traps are enabled on the switch, a trap is sent for a failure that
identifies the switch, the EtherChannel, and the failed link. Inbound
broadcast and multicast packets on one link in an EtherChannel are blocked
from returning on any other link of the EtherChannel. "

and you can see this in the "debug snmp packets"

00:16:11: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Port-channel1, changed state to down
00:16:11: SNMP: Queuing packet to 1.1.1.2
00:16:11: SNMP: V1 Trap, ent ciscoSyslogMIB.2, addr 1.1.1.1, gentrap 6,
spectrap 1
 clogHistoryEntry.2.22 = LINK
 clogHistoryEntry.3.22 = 4
 clogHistoryEntry.4.22 = UPDOWN
 clogHistoryEntry.5.22 = Interface Port-channel1, changed state to down
 clogHistoryEntry.6.22 = 97125
00:16:11: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to
down
00:16:11: SNMP: Queuing packet to 1.1.1.2
00:16:11: SNMP: V1 Trap, ent ciscoSyslogMIB.2, addr 1.1.1.1, gentrap 6,
spectrap 1
 clogHistoryEntry.2.23 = LINK
 clogHistoryEntry.3.23 = 4
 clogHistoryEntry.4.23 = UPDOWN
 clogHistoryEntry.5.23 = Interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1, changed state to
down
 clogHistoryEntry.6.23 = 97127
Switch#sh etherchannel summary
Number of channel-groups in use: 1
Number of aggregators:           1
Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1      Po1(SD)          -        Gi1/0/1(D)

--
Garry L. Baker

"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com


On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Netman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Marko,
>
> I was listening to the Ether-channel MP3 and you discussed a trap with
> Port-channel mode ON when the ports have LACP or PAGP configured as the
> dynamic trunk protocol.  I was not 100% on the example, but it seemed like a
> really good "trap".
>
>
> Can you help me understand that example?
>
>
> Last question: do you have a place where we can ask questions about
> particular products or even tasks and then look up the historical responses
> for that product?  Or is it just the mailing list and the archive that we
> need search?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Ray
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to