I would agree with the Marko's recomendation. Change domain to tempXYZ then change it back to the acutal VTP domain. This will reset the revision number to 0.
Even VTP clients can overwrite VTP servers if they have a higher revision version than the server. On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Abel ... <[email protected]> wrote: > A easy way to do it could be just set it as a VTP client and set the > priority to the highest first, update the vlan database, in the case that > the database is huge, > disconect it from the network, change it to Server, connect it again and > then change the priority a few point higher than the current root. This > could a more mechanical method but I think is the safer in case you're > working in a network that you don't manage end to end. > > Greets > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Farzad A. Cheema > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I have a 6509 switch running as a vtp server and I would like to add >> another identical switch for resilience but with vtp status server. >> >> >> >> How can you make sure the new switch doesn’t affect the vlan database on >> existing switch? Basically we want both 6509 switches to be vtp servers. >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> Farzad >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please >> visit www.ipexpert.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > >
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
