Yes, I verified that I'm using the latest document.  The walk through video 
also 
referencing the configuration of the Ethernet Switch.  The DSG does, too.  So, 
in this instance, it's still in there.

So, if I want to successfully complete this task, I need to obtain (more) 
hardware.  :(

 
Regards,
Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, MCSE






________________________________
From: Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]>
To: Jay McMickle <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, July 25, 2010 12:41:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 lab 7

Thanks. I will also check on my end.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!

Mailto: [email protected]
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 10:40, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm. I downloaded it last month I will login and check.
>
> Regards,
> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, MCSE
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Marko Milivojevic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Jay, I was under the impression that all labs depending on that module
>> have been removed and/or updated. Are you using the latest version of
>> our material?
>>
>> --
>> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
>> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>>
>> Mailto: [email protected]
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 09:06, Jay McMickle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Has anyone thought of or found an alternative to the Ethernet switch needed
>>> for lab7 in R2 (3800 series)?
>>> Regards,
>>> Jay McMickle- CCNP, CCSP, MCSE
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to
>>>    [email protected]
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>    http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>    [email protected]
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>    [email protected]
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..."
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>   1. multicast igmp filtering (marc abel)
>>>   2. Re: multicast igmp filtering (marc abel)
>>>   3. Re: multicast igmp filtering (Steve Shaw)
>>>   4. Re: multicast igmp filtering (marc abel)
>>>
>>> I'm working on Vol 1 Lab 24 task 8 + 9 and can't reproduce what is shown in
>>> the DSG. The task shows us applying an access list on F0/0 for R5,R6,R7 like
>>> this:
>>>
>>> access-list 11 deny 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.254
>>> access-list 11 permit 224.0.0.1 15.255.255.255
>>> int f0/0
>>> ip igmp access-group 11
>>>
>>> Then the solution guide show the output of Debug ip igmp. In the output they
>>> show 240.0.0.0 blocked on fastethernet 0/0 like this:
>>>
>>> Jul 24 16:14:34.903: IGMP(*): Group 224.0.1.40 access denied on
>>> Fastethernet0/0
>>>
>>> I can not get my routers to produce this line. My outputs seem to be keyed
>>> to the loopbacks. If I apply the access-list to my loopback interface then I
>>> will indeed see this line:
>>>
>>> Jul 24 16:14:34.903: IGMP(*): Group 224.0.1.40 access denied on loopback0
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>> Here are the relevant parts of my config on R7 (R6 and R5 are identical)
>>>
>>> hostname R7
>>>
>>> ip multicast-routing
>>>
>>> interface Loopback0
>>>  ip address 200.0.0.7 255.255.255.255
>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>>  ip address 150.100.220.7 255.255.255.0
>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>>  ip igmp access-group 11
>>>  duplex auto
>>>  speed auto
>>> !
>>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>>  ip address 150.100.221.7 255.255.255.0
>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>>  duplex auto
>>>  speed auto
>>>
>>> ip pim autorp listener
>>> !
>>> access-list 11 deny   224.0.0.0 15.255.255.254
>>> access-list 11 permit 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255
>>>
>>> Further testing shows other groups blocked correctly. I just can't seem to
>>> block 224.0.1.40 as the DSG shows. I wonder if there is some mechanism that
>>> prevents 224.0.1.40 from being filtered.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:33 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on Vol 1 Lab 24 task 8 + 9 and can't reproduce what is shown
>>>> in the DSG. The task shows us applying an access list on F0/0 for R5,R6,R7
>>>> like this:
>>>>
>>>> access-list 11 deny 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.254
>>>> access-list 11 permit 224.0.0.1 15.255.255.255
>>>> int f0/0
>>>> ip igmp access-group 11
>>>>
>>>> Then the solution guide show the output of Debug ip igmp. In the output
>>>> they show 240.0.0.0 blocked on fastethernet 0/0 like this:
>>>>
>>>> Jul 24 16:14:34.903: IGMP(*): Group 224.0.1.40 access denied on
>>>> Fastethernet0/0
>>>>
>>>> I can not get my routers to produce this line. My outputs seem to be keyed
>>>> to the loopbacks. If I apply the access-list to my loopback interface then 
I
>>>> will indeed see this line:
>>>>
>>>> Jul 24 16:14:34.903: IGMP(*): Group 224.0.1.40 access denied on loopback0
>>>>
>>>> What am I missing?
>>>>
>>>> Here are the relevant parts of my config on R7 (R6 and R5 are identical)
>>>>
>>>> hostname R7
>>>>
>>>> ip multicast-routing
>>>>
>>>> interface Loopback0
>>>>  ip address 200.0.0.7 255.255.255.255
>>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>>> !
>>>> interface FastEthernet0/0
>>>>  ip address 150.100.220.7 255.255.255.0
>>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>>>  ip igmp access-group 11
>>>>  duplex auto
>>>>  speed auto
>>>> !
>>>> interface FastEthernet0/1
>>>>  ip address 150.100.221.7 255.255.255.0
>>>>  ip pim sparse-mode
>>>>  duplex auto
>>>>  speed auto
>>>>
>>>> ip pim autorp listener
>>>> !
>>>> access-list 11 deny   224.0.0.0 15.255.255.254
>>>> access-list 11 permit 224.0.0.0 15.255.255.255
>>>>
>>>
>>> Marc, when would you see 224.0.1.40 in your network?
>>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2010 1:27 PM, "marc abel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Further testing shows other groups blocked correctly. I just can't seem to
>>> block 224.0.1.40 as the DSG shows. I wonder if there is some mechanism that
>>> prevents 224.0.1.40 from being filtered.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:33 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on Vol 1 L...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> For RP discovery. Garry Baker showed me that it has to do with last IGMP
>>> reporter for the group
>>>
>>> R7(config-if)#do show ip igmp mem
>>>
>>>
>>>  Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp.  Flags
>>> Interface
>>>  *,224.0.1.39                   200.0.0.7       00:06:21 02:25 2LA    Lo0
>>>  *,224.0.1.40                   200.0.0.7       00:04:17 02:28 2LA    Lo0
>>>
>>> Now if I shut down lo0
>>>
>>> do show ip igmp mem
>>>
>>>
>>>  Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp.  Flags
>>> Interface
>>>  *,224.0.1.39                   150.100.220.7   02:13:16 02:51 2LA    Fa0/0
>>>  *,224.0.1.40                   150.100.220.7   00:00:08 stop  2LA    Fa0/0
>>>
>>> and now I start seeing the filtering happen.
>>>
>>> I guess I am still a bit deficient in my understanding of the RP process
>>> because seemingly the RP traffic to group 224.0.1.40 would be coming in from
>>> interface f0/0 but maybe since the source of the join was lo0 that is why.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Steve Shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Marc, when would you see 224.0.1.40 in your network?
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 24, 2010 1:27 PM, "marc abel" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Further testing shows other groups blocked correctly. I just can't seem to
>>>> block 224.0.1.40 as the DSG shows. I wonder if there is some mechanism that
>>>> prevents 224.0.1.40 from being filtered.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:33 AM, marc abel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm working on Vol 1 L...
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>



      
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to